Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory internal-categories k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeJan 28th 2010
   • (edited Jan 28th 2010)
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: Markdowncan anyone point me to some useful discussion of cosismplicial simplicial abelian groups <latex> \Delta \to [\Delta^{op}, Ab] </latex> and cosimplicial simplicial rings <latex> \Delta \to [\Delta^{op}, CRing] </latex> I guess there should be a Dold-Kan correspondence relating these to _unbounded_ (co)chain complexes (that may be nontrivial both in positive as well as in negative degree). I suppose it's kind of straightforward how this should work, but I'd still ike to know of any literature that might discuss this. Anything?

   can anyone point me to some useful discussion of cosismplicial simplicial abelian groups

   

   and cosimplicial simplicial rings

   

   I guess there should be a Dold-Kan correspondence relating these to unbounded (co)chain complexes (that may be nontrivial both in positive as well as in negative degree). I suppose it's kind of straightforward how this should work, but I'd still ike to know of any literature that might discuss this. Anything?

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorzskoda
   • CommentTimeJan 28th 2010
   • PermaLink
   Author: zskoda
   Format: MarkdownBut the totalization functor in either the second or in the third quadrant still give unboundedness in one direction only, isn't it ?

   But the totalization functor in either the second or in the third quadrant still give unboundedness in one direction only, isn't it ?

3. • CommentRowNumber3.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeJan 28th 2010
   • (edited Jan 28th 2010)
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownAm I mixed up? Let me see. We have a double complex <latex> C^{p,q} </latex> with one differential increasing <latex> p </latex> <latex> d : C^{p,q} \to C^{p+1,q}</latex> and the other decreasing <latex> q </latex> <latex> \delta : C^{p,q} \to C^{p,q-1}</latex> This gives me single differential <latex> D = d \pm \delta </latex> of definite degree (say +1) if the total degree is taken to be <latex> p - q </latex>. So if both <latex> p </latex> and <latex> q </latex> ranged in <latex> \mathbb{N} </latex> this gives degrees in all of <latex> \mathbb{Z} </latex>. And I'd think this is what I get from forming the chain complex of a cosimplicial simplicial abelian group: a chain complex (<latex> \delta </latex>) of cochain complexes (<latex> d </latex>). Do you agree?

   Am I mixed up? Let me see.

   We have a double complex with one differential increasing

   

   and the other decreasing

   

   This gives me single differential

   

   of definite degree (say +1) if the total degree is taken to be .

   So if both and ranged in this gives degrees in all of .

   And I'd think this is what I get from forming the chain complex of a cosimplicial simplicial abelian group: a chain complex () of cochain complexes ().

   Do you agree?