Not signed in (Sign In)

Start a new discussion

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry bundle bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality education elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration finite foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory infinity integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
    • CommentTimeFeb 2nd 2010

    We've had a stub at representation for awhile; I rewrote it and let intertwiner redirect to it. But it's still a stub.

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorHarry Gindi
    • CommentTimeFeb 2nd 2010
    • (edited Feb 2nd 2010)
    Is there any difference between diagram and representation? It seems like we're reinventing the wheel here. It seems wiser to say that a representation is a specific type of diagram, if anything.
    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
    • CommentTimeFeb 2nd 2010

    There is no difference, in their most general forms, between diagrams, representations, and functors.

    But it's not that we're reinventing the wheel; rather, other people have reinvented the wheel already and we're recording when they use these terms and why.

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorzskoda
    • CommentTimeFeb 2nd 2010

    Actions of beasts with many objects, e.g. categories, algebroids etc. involve anchor maps, anchor functors and alike. It is sometimes convenient to pack the whole gadget involving action into the action category involving both the acting category and acted upon entity. Maybe we should mention that point of view, often (among people near by) emphasised by Urs, Igor and others.

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
    • CommentTimeFeb 2nd 2010

    We have an old page action that should have this point of view mentioned on it.

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorTim_Porter
    • CommentTimeFeb 3rd 2010

    Perhaps some very basic idea as to why representation theory of groups was thought up could be added. My recollection was that it was an attempt to use the well understood invariants of matrices, permutations etc, to obtain clearer information on abstract groups. We seem to have two views in the entry that instead of complementing each other (two faces of the same coin sort of thing) are pulling in slightly differing directions. Diagrams and representations are two names for the same things but form parts of different processes. A `DIAGRAM' somehow relates various different parts of a whole, whilst a representation more or less tries to explain one structure in terms of another.

    Should we be trying to put forward something along these lines. I suspect there are aspects of `representations' that the above view ignores, so ... .

    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeFeb 3rd 2010

    Should we be trying to put forward something along these lines.

    Sure! Please go ahead and add this.

    • CommentRowNumber8.
    • CommentAuthorTim_Porter
    • CommentTimeFeb 3rd 2010

    I have made a start. Please have a look and see if it does the job. I hope that we can link somewhere to the Café discussions on higher geometry higher actions, etc. and so I laid down some possible starts for later developments.

    • CommentRowNumber9.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeFeb 3rd 2010

    Okay, thanks!

    I thought before the "Historical idea"-part we should have a real short plain "Idea"-part.

    I have added a suggestion for that now. Maybe it is not quite a short as it should be. Have a look and feel free to take it apart.

    I also edited the section layout a bit, rflecting the way how I think the entry seems to be developing.. See if you agree.

    • CommentRowNumber10.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeFeb 4th 2010

    created stub for category of representations (and redirected: representation category)

    • CommentRowNumber11.
    • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
    • CommentTimeFeb 4th 2010

    While revising representation, don't forget that we also have representation theory.

    • CommentRowNumber12.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeFeb 4th 2010

    Yes, I did think of that. But I don't feel yet in shape to give a good account there. We should ask David Ben-Zvi for a guest contribution here...

Add your comments
  • Please log in or leave your comment as a "guest post". If commenting as a "guest", please include your name in the message as a courtesy. Note: only certain categories allow guest posts.
  • To produce a hyperlink to an nLab entry, simply put double square brackets around its name, e.g. [[category]]. To use (La)TeX mathematics in your post, make sure Markdown+Itex is selected below and put your mathematics between dollar signs as usual. Only a subset of the usual TeX math commands are accepted: see here for a list.

  • (Help)