Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory internal-categories k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).

nLab > Latest Changes: dinatural transformation

Bottom of Page

1 to 9 of 9

  1.  
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeJun 17th 2016

    Expanded dinatural transformation a little with examples and references.

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorTodd_Trimble
    • CommentTimeJun 17th 2016

    I’m very glad you did, because it was through the Paré and Román reference that I relocated examples of dinatural transformations (due to Freyd) that I thought were forever lost to buried memory. I may copy them out later.

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorRodMcGuire
    • CommentTimeJun 17th 2016

    All I did in my edit was to fix the bad link in:

    Here is a blog post inspired by the above discussion that discusses these concepts in the context of the programming language Haskell:

    to

    Dinatural transformations and coends

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeJul 16th 2020

    Added

    • Guy McCusker, Alessio Santamaria, A Calculus of Substitution for Dinatural Transformations, I, (arXiv:2007.07576)

    diff, v21, current

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorHurkyl
    • CommentTimeAug 15th 2020

    Added a yoneda-like correspondence between dinatural transformations and natural transformations between certain hom-sets.

    Also, the discussion in “dinaturality vs extranaturality” has some errors. In particular, in the “bending” calculation, G(x,y) F(y,x)G(x,y)^{F(y,x)} doesn’t make sense. Is it supposed to be D(F(y,x),G(x,y))D(F(y,x), G(x,y)) similar to the yoneda-like description I added?

    diff, v22, current

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeAug 15th 2020

    Yes, I think that’s what’s meant. In fact what’s going on here is basically the same as in your two-sided Yoneda lemma: the hom-profunctor is a representing object for extranatural transformations.

    I don’t see any other errors, what else do you have in mind?

    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorTodd_Trimble
    • CommentTimeDec 24th 2020

    Fixed.

    diff, v23, current

  9. Convert the main hexagon to tikz-cd

    Andrea Laretto

    diff, v28, current

1 to 9 of 9

  1.