Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology definitions deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
   • CommentTimeJul 13th 2016
   • PermaLink
   Author: Mike Shulman
   Format: MarkdownItexAt [[Sweedler notation]], Zoran wrote > One can formalize in fact which manipulations are allowed with such a reduced notation. Where can I find such a formalization?

   At Sweedler notation, Zoran wrote

   One can formalize in fact which manipulations are allowed with such a reduced notation.

   Where can I find such a formalization?

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorzskoda
   • CommentTimeJul 18th 2016
   • PermaLink
   Author: zskoda
   Format: MarkdownItexI thought it through as a graduate student, but I do not have a complete writeup.

   I thought it through as a graduate student, but I do not have a complete writeup.

3. • CommentRowNumber3.
   • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
   • CommentTimeJul 19th 2016
   • PermaLink
   Author: Mike Shulman
   Format: MarkdownItexOk thanks! I ask because I'm messing around with a "type theory for props" that would be a more general formalization of this sort of notation, and it would be nice to compare it with anything that exists.

   Ok thanks! I ask because I’m messing around with a “type theory for props” that would be a more general formalization of this sort of notation, and it would be nice to compare it with anything that exists.