Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory internal-categories k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthordec41
    • CommentTimeJul 14th 2016

    I’ve started a page category of G sets. I will continue to fill in more details as I have time. Some of the information from ZFA can probably be moved here.

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeJul 14th 2016

    Great, but it does need to be linked to existing pages such as G-set, topological G-space and permutation representation. You may find that this suggests some reorganisation of existing material.

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorDexter Chua
    • CommentTimeJul 14th 2016
    Yes. I think the G-set page can talk about topological groups as well. (I'm the same person as OP, but thought I should use my real name instead - didn't realize username was the same as the displayed name when signing up)
    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeJul 14th 2016

    One thing. We have tended to use a capitalised form ’X’ for ’the category of xs’, sometimes with abbreviations, so Set, Cat, Grpd, Infinity-Grpd, FinSet, etc. That policy would be awkward here since the ’G’ of ’G-set’ is already a capital. ’G-Set’ would be natural, but perhaps too subtle.

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorDexter Chua
    • CommentTimeJul 14th 2016
    The Elephant uses Cont(G) to denote the category, while MacLane and Moerdijk uses BG. I thought BG might be confusing here, since "B" is often taken to mean "delooping" in the nLab, so I opted for something that resembles the Elephant's usage.

    I tend to imagine Cont (or Cts) as something like a functor TopGrp -> Cat that sends each group to the corresponding category, similar to how we write Sh(C, J) for the category of sheaves on a site.

    Another possible notation is Cts-G-Set.
    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeJul 14th 2016

    We also have MSet and Understanding M-Set.

    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorDexter Chua
    • CommentTimeJul 14th 2016
    I'll go for GSet, then.
    • CommentRowNumber8.
    • CommentAuthorDexter Chua
    • CommentTimeJul 14th 2016
    Added a few more basic properties about the topos.