Not signed in (Sign In)

Start a new discussion

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry bundles calculus categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-theory cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics comma complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science connection constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundations functional-analysis functor galois-theory gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry goodwillie-calculus graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory history homological homological-algebra homology homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie lie-theory limit limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal-logic model model-category-theory monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nonassociative noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pasting philosophy physics planar pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory subobject superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeAug 21st 2016
    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorfastlane69
    • CommentTimeAug 21st 2016
    • (edited Aug 21st 2016)

    If I may be so bold, I think it is a bad idea to use ’virtual’ as part of the name.

    As I read it, the only nod to ’virtual’ in Virtual double category is :

    The relevant transformations are a “virtual” version of vertical transformations between ordinary double category

    and

    It is a generalized multicategory, in the sense of Hermida, Cruttwell-Shulman, and others, relative to the monad T T on graphs-internal-to-Cat whose algebras are double categories. This is the origin of the name “virtual double category,” in line with the general terminology “virtual T T-algebra” of Cruttwell-Shulman for such generalized multicategories.

    Thus if the only use of virtual here, as I read it, is that two things are “virtually the same” and if so, IMO, this will lead to confusion.

    Personally, as a physicist, ’virtual’ carries too much of the original “virtual particle” connotation: not ’real’ (i.e., virtual) but convenient for calculations.

    On top of that, from my programming days, “virtual reality”’ again emphasizes that this reality is not the ’real’ one but a virtual one.

    If this is the sense of virtual in these categories, that they are not ’real’ in some context, I apologize and I’ll read more carefully.

    But otherwise, based on these quotes…

    A virtual double category or fc fc-multicategory is a common generalization of a monoidal category, a bicategory, a double category, and a multicategory. […] Virtual double categories are related to double categories precisely as ordinary multicategories are related to monoidal categories (see generalized multicategory and tensor product).

    …something like “generalized double category” would be less confusing IMO.

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorfastlane69
    • CommentTimeAug 21st 2016
    • (edited Aug 21st 2016)

    Here again, for example:

    The profunctors between [virtual] double categories are a similar [“virtualization” of] the notion of double profunctor between double categories.

    If you change “virtualiztion” to generalization, you don’t need to use air-quotes and, as I read it, you preserve (my perceived) intent behind “virtualization”:

    The profunctors between [generalized] double categories are a similar [generalization on] the notion of double profunctor between double categories.

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeAug 21st 2016

    The general principle of the name is that a “virtual TT-algebra” is close to, but not quite, a “real” TT-algebra. In other words, exactly what you want.

    The adjective “generalized” doesn’t convey any indication of in exactly what way something has been “generalized”, whereas by using a particular term of art we can be specific.

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorfastlane69
    • CommentTimeAug 21st 2016
    • (edited Aug 21st 2016)

    I understand your intent and this is a good lesson for me on using the world “generalized”; thanks for that.

    Just keep in mind that if a person familiar with Computer Science and/or Physics comes across this term, they may conflate among the various different definitions already in usage for ’virtual’, especially the existential context where ’virtual’ means “isn’t real” and “doesn’t exist”.

Add your comments
  • Please log in or leave your comment as a "guest post". If commenting as a "guest", please include your name in the message as a courtesy. Note: only certain categories allow guest posts.
  • To produce a hyperlink to an nLab entry, simply put double square brackets around its name, e.g. [[category]]. To use (La)TeX mathematics in your post, make sure Markdown+Itex is selected below and put your mathematics between dollar signs as usual. Only a subset of the usual TeX math commands are accepted: see here for a list.

  • (Help)