Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Discussion Tag Cloud

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeSep 2nd 2016

    At Fréchet space I have added to the Idea-section a paragraph motivating the definition via families of seminorms from the example of =limnn. And I touched the description of this example in the main text, now here.

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorzskoda
    • CommentTimeSep 4th 2016
    • (edited Sep 4th 2016)

    (Beware that the same symbol “” is also used for the corresponding direct sum/injective limit, which is different.)

    Also it is used for the same (“projective”) limit but with n being a dicrete space (what leads to a linearly compact vector space). I added redirect linearly compact vector space to linearly compact module.

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeOct 18th 2017
    • (edited Oct 18th 2017)

    I have added the statement (here) that “path smooth” linear functions on a Fréchet space are continuous.

    (This sounds like the kind of statement somebody here would already have recorded years back, but I didn’t find it stated in any entry.)

  1. adding dollar signs in spots (such as in the definition of the directional derivative, Frechet spaces F, G) where they are missing

    cofo

    diff, v34, current

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorDmitri Pavlov
    • CommentTimeMar 3rd 2025

    Added:

    There are two inequivalent definitions of Fréchet spaces found in the literature. The original definition due to Stefan Banach defines Fréchet spaces as metrizable complete topological vector spaces.

    Later Bourbaki (Topological vector spaces, Section II.4.1) added the condition of local convexity. However, many authors continue to use the original definition due to Banach.

    The term “F-space” can refer to either of these definitions, although in the modern literature it is more commonly used to refer to the non-locally convex notion.

    diff, v36, current

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorDavidRoberts
    • CommentTimeMar 4th 2025

    @Dmitri

    what’s a recent reference that uses the older definition?

    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorDmitri Pavlov
    • CommentTimeMar 4th 2025

    Re #6:

    Albert Wilansky, Modern Methods in Topological Vector Spaces (1978; reprinted by Dover in 2013)

    Lucien Waelbroeck, Topological Vector Spaces and Algebras (1971)

    (For the subject of topological vector spaces, 1970s could qualify as “recent”.)

    • CommentRowNumber8.
    • CommentAuthorDmitri Pavlov
    • CommentTimeMar 4th 2025

    Added references for the terminology:

    There are two inequivalent definitions of Fréchet spaces found in the literature. The original definition due to Stefan Banach defines Fréchet spaces as metrizable complete topological vector spaces. The books of Waelbroeck (1971) and Wilansky (1978) use the original definition.

    In 1953 Bourbaki (Topological vector spaces, Section II.4.1) added the condition of local convexity. This convention is followed by the books of Jarchow (1981), Köthe (1969), Schaefer (1971).

    The term “F-space” can refer to either of these definitions, although in the modern literature it is more commonly used to refer to the non-locally convex notion. The books of Köthe (1969) and Schaefer (1971) require F-spaces to be locally convex.

    diff, v38, current