Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Discussion Tag Cloud

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeOct 25th 2016
    • (edited Oct 25th 2016)

    I have started an entry Majorana spinor with discussion of how the physicist’s concept going by that name is a real structure on a complex spin representation.

    Initially I had wanted to just follow the note by Figueroa-O’Farrill, but either I am missing something or else there is a gap in the argument there.

    So in particular at the moment I have just one direction “Majorana structure is real structure”, not the converse.

    (And why is it that the proposition number cross referencing is again broken?)

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeOct 27th 2016

    I have expanded a good bit further at Majorana spinor.

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeOct 28th 2016

    Have added a section Examples – In dimensions 11, 10 and 9 with a bunch of relations between Majorana spinors in these dimensions that govern KK-compactification and T-duality between the corresponding supergravity theories.