Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeMay 8th 2017
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexI have given _[[product topological space]]_ an semi-informal Idea-section that means to quickly and transparently tell the reader what they need to know. This is in reaction to what we presently have at _[[Tychonoff product]]_ which presently seems needlesly intransparent for the purpose of a reader who just wants to know what the open subsets actually are. I was thinking about merging _[[product topological space]]_ with _[[Tychonoff product]]_. I haven''t yet, but mostly just due to lack of energy.

   I have given product topological space an semi-informal Idea-section that means to quickly and transparently tell the reader what they need to know.

   This is in reaction to what we presently have at Tychonoff product which presently seems needlesly intransparent for the purpose of a reader who just wants to know what the open subsets actually are.

   I was thinking about merging product topological space with Tychonoff product. I haven”t yet, but mostly just due to lack of energy.

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorTodd_Trimble
   • CommentTimeMay 8th 2017
   • PermaLink
   Author: Todd_Trimble
   Format: MarkdownItexI disfavor "Tychonoff product" as practically no one uses that phrase. I would keep [[product topological space]] and merge the other way.

   I disfavor “Tychonoff product” as practically no one uses that phrase. I would keep product topological space and merge the other way.

3. • CommentRowNumber3.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeMay 8th 2017
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexOkay, I have merged the entries.

   Okay, I have merged the entries.