Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Discussion Tag Cloud

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMay 22nd 2017
    • (edited May 22nd 2017)

    at general linear group we only had some sentences on its incarnation as an algebraic group. I have started a subsection Definition – As a topological group with some basics.

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMay 29th 2017

    What’s a quick proof that the topology on GL(n,k) as a subspace of n2 with its Euclidean topology coincides with that as a subspace of Maps(kn,kn) with its compact-open topology?

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorTodd_Trimble
    • CommentTimeMay 29th 2017

    I guess k=?

    So we do have an injective continuous map GL(n,)Map(n,n), the currying of the continuous action GL(n,)×nn. This says that the usual Euclidean topology is finer than the subspace topology coming from Map(n,n).

    But the Euclidean topology is also coarser. Let’s do this for M(n,) instead of GL(n,). A Euclidean neighborhood base of a linear map or matrix A consists of sets of the form {B:1in|AeiBei|<ε}. But this is a basis/base element for the function space topology, ni=1C(Ki,Ui) where Ki={ei} and Ui is the ε-ball about Aei.

    (It may help to think of convergence in the function space topology as the exact same as uniform convergence over every compact set.)

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMay 29th 2017

    Thanks, Todd!

    I have added that to the entry here.