Processing math: 100%
Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Discussion Tag Cloud

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMay 26th 2017

    Created a little entry Vect(X) (to go along with Vect) and used the occasion to give distributive monoidal category the Examples-section that it was missing and similarly touched the Examples-section at rig category.

  1. Added link to Vect(X).

    diff, v3, current

  2. Oops, that comment was supposed to go on the vector bundles page.

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeNov 21st 2022

    I see that “VectBund” was redirecting to here, while it ought to be pointing to an entry about the category of vector bundles over arbitrary base spaces, with morphisms covering non-trivial maps of base spaces.

    I am removing the redirect now and will instead start an entry VectBund.

    diff, v4, current

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorperezl.alonso
    • CommentTimeMar 6th 2025

    Assuming X is a smooth manifold, has Vect(X) been given a smooth tensor category structure? I understand one would exhibit Vect(X) as a sheaf on say CartSp with the tensor operations but has this been done explicitly anywhere?

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMar 7th 2025

    Let’s see. With Vect denoting the 2-sheaf of categories of vector bundles over Cartesian spaces, you probably mean by a smooth form of Vect(X) the internal hom [X,Vect] in the 2-topos over CartSp. Now the CartSp-wise tensor product of vector bundles should make Vect a monoid object in that 2-topos, I suppose, whence the question comes down to whether the internal hom into a monoid object inherits monoid structure — which is clearly the case, I’d think.

    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorperezl.alonso
    • CommentTimeMar 7th 2025

    I see, thanks, Urs.