Not signed in (Sign In)

Start a new discussion

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-categories 2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry bundles calculus categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-theory cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive constructive-mathematics cosmology definitions deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry differential-topology digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration finite foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry goodwillie-calculus graph graphs gravity grothendieck group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory infinity integration integration-theory k-theory lie lie-theory limit limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic manifolds mathematics measure-theory modal-logic model model-category-theory monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology multicategories nonassociative noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory string-theory subobject superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeJul 1st 2017

    I added to walking structure a 2-categorical theorem that implies that usually “the underlying X of the walking X is the initial X”. This fact seems like it should be well-known, but I don’t offhand know a reference for it, can anyone give a pointer?

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorPeter Heinig
    • CommentTimeJul 1st 2017
    • (edited Jul 1st 2017)

    Unsure whether this is any help, but similar in spirit seem some characterizations of indiscrete categories. Internal pointer: indiscrete category, Section 2. External pointer: e.g. page 13 in pdf of this talk: http://benedikt-ahrens.de/talks/Fields_HoTT_2016.pdf.

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeJul 1st 2017

    I don’t see any relationship.

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeFeb 19th 2018

    I realized that the above claim that “the underlying X of the walking X is the initial X” was a little overbroad; the situation is a bit subtler than that. The problem is that the “underlying set” functor C(I,)C(I,-) of a monoidal category is in general only lax monoidal, whereas the universal property of a “walking X qua monoidal category” is relative to strong monoidal functors. The argument works much better for things like categories with products, where the relevant categorical structure is preserved by the “underlying set” functor C(1,)C(1,-). I think we can conclude things about some walking Xs qua monoidal category, by applying the argument to multicategories instead and using the fact that a multicategory embeds fully-faithfully in the monoidal category that it freely generates (since if X is something that makes sense in a multicategory, then the walking X qua monoidal category is the free monoidal category generate by the walking X qua multicategory). But for other walking Xs qua monoidal category the claim doesn’t even make sense. I’ve updated the page walking structure with this.

Add your comments
  • Please log in or leave your comment as a "guest post". If commenting as a "guest", please include your name in the message as a courtesy. Note: only certain categories allow guest posts.
  • To produce a hyperlink to an nLab entry, simply put double square brackets around its name, e.g. [[category]]. To use (La)TeX mathematics in your post, make sure Markdown+Itex is selected below and put your mathematics between dollar signs as usual. Only a subset of the usual TeX math commands are accepted: see here for a list.

  • (Help)