Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology definitions deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
   • CommentTimeJul 21st 2017
   • PermaLink
   Author: Mike Shulman
   Format: MarkdownItexI removed the footnote at [[adjunct]] (as just noted elsewhere, I don't think footnotes are usually a good choice). I put a brief mention of the musical notation in the main text, put the example of currying in an "Examples" section, and the references in a "References" section. I removed the discussion about pronunciation entirely; I think there is no need to tell the reader how to pronounce mathematical notation, at least when it is fairly obvious (how else would you pronounce $f^\sharp$ than "f-sharp"?).

   I removed the footnote at adjunct (as just noted elsewhere, I don’t think footnotes are usually a good choice). I put a brief mention of the musical notation in the main text, put the example of currying in an “Examples” section, and the references in a “References” section. I removed the discussion about pronunciation entirely; I think there is no need to tell the reader how to pronounce mathematical notation, at least when it is fairly obvious (how else would you pronounce $f^\sharp$ than “f-sharp”?).

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
   • CommentTimeJul 21st 2017
   • PermaLink
   Author: Mike Shulman
   Format: MarkdownItexSimilar edit at [[exponential object]].

   Similar edit at exponential object.

3. • CommentRowNumber3.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeJul 21st 2017
   • (edited Jul 21st 2017)
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItex> how else would you pronounce $f^\sharp$ than “f-sharp” it could easily be read "f-hash".

   how else would you pronounce $f^\sharp$ than “f-sharp”

   it could easily be read “f-hash”.

4. • CommentRowNumber4.
   • CommentAuthorTodd_Trimble
   • CommentTimeJul 21st 2017
   • PermaLink
   Author: Todd_Trimble
   Format: MarkdownItexBut when $f^\sharp$ is coupled with $f^\flat$, there can be no doubt.

   But when $f^\sharp$ is coupled with $f^\flat$, there can be no doubt.

5. • CommentRowNumber5.
   • CommentAuthorPeter Heinig
   • CommentTimeJul 21st 2017
   • (edited Jul 21st 2017)
   • PermaLink
   Author: Peter Heinig
   Format: MarkdownItex> But when $f^\sharp$ is coupled with $f^\flat$, there can be no doubt. To me is seems rather the other way round: *especially* when $f^\flat$ shows up (and someone is neither knowledgeable or industrious enough to click the "source" link and look at the latex, nor musically educated), then there *can* be doubt, and it will usually be read "f bee" (by such readers, I mean). Personally, I think mentioning "sharp", "flat" and even "stave notation", and yes, in a footnote, better, but this is my feeling/opinion only and I will not try to give reasons for this. I greatly appreciate that the nLab has some sort of editorial line and tries to maintain a reasonably uniform style. We should not get into an argument about $\sharp$ and $\flat$.

   But when $f^\sharp$ is coupled with $f^\flat$, there can be no doubt.

   To me is seems rather the other way round: especially when $f^\flat$ shows up (and someone is neither knowledgeable or industrious enough to click the “source” link and look at the latex, nor musically educated), then there can be doubt, and it will usually be read “f bee” (by such readers, I mean).

   Personally, I think mentioning “sharp”, “flat” and even “stave notation”, and yes, in a footnote, better, but this is my feeling/opinion only and I will not try to give reasons for this.

   I greatly appreciate that the nLab has some sort of editorial line and tries to maintain a reasonably uniform style. We should not get into an argument about $\sharp$ and $\flat$.

6. • CommentRowNumber6.
   • CommentAuthorDavidRoberts
   • CommentTimeJul 21st 2017
   • (edited Jul 21st 2017)
   • PermaLink
   Author: DavidRoberts
   Format: MarkdownItexWhile $\sharp$ and $\#$ are sufficiently different to make it clear something is up, it's not obvious at all that $f_!$ is pronounced "f lower shriek" (and ditto for upper shriek), so that is perhaps warranted.

   While $\sharp$ and $\#$ are sufficiently different to make it clear something is up, it’s not obvious at all that $f_!$ is pronounced “f lower shriek” (and ditto for upper shriek), so that is perhaps warranted.

7. • CommentRowNumber7.
   • CommentAuthorTodd_Trimble
   • CommentTimeJul 21st 2017
   • PermaLink
   Author: Todd_Trimble
   Format: MarkdownItexAs a compromise: if Urs and Peter really feel there is a danger here, then something like "sometimes the notation $f^\sharp$ and $f^\flat$ (as in music) is used" should be more than sufficient. We should trust that readers have a basic general education, after all.

   As a compromise: if Urs and Peter really feel there is a danger here, then something like “sometimes the notation $f^\sharp$ and $f^\flat$ (as in music) is used” should be more than sufficient. We should trust that readers have a basic general education, after all.

8. • CommentRowNumber8.
   • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
   • CommentTimeJul 21st 2017
   • PermaLink
   Author: Mike Shulman
   Format: MarkdownItexI agree that the pronunciation of $f_!$ is worth mentioning where it appears, and I'd be okay with Todd's suggestion in #7.

   I agree that the pronunciation of $f_!$ is worth mentioning where it appears, and I’d be okay with Todd’s suggestion in #7.

9. • CommentRowNumber9.
   • CommentAuthorTodd_Trimble
   • CommentTimeJul 21st 2017
   • PermaLink
   Author: Todd_Trimble
   Format: MarkdownItexI made the musical notes (ha ha) in [[adjunct]] and [[exponential object]]. I'm not sure where $f_!$ appears (probably lots of places; where should we make a note of it?).

   I made the musical notes (ha ha) in adjunct and exponential object. I’m not sure where $f_!$ appears (probably lots of places; where should we make a note of it?).

10. • CommentRowNumber10.
    • CommentAuthorDavidRoberts
    • CommentTimeJul 21st 2017
    • PermaLink
    Author: DavidRoberts
    Format: MarkdownItex[[direct image with compact support]] and presumably [[exceptional inverse image]].

    direct image with compact support and presumably exceptional inverse image.

11. • CommentRowNumber11.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeJul 22nd 2017
    • PermaLink
    Author: Mike Shulman
    Format: MarkdownItex[[essential geometric morphism]], [[locally connected geometric morphism]]

    essential geometric morphism, locally connected geometric morphism