Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf sheaves simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
    • CommentTimeSep 21st 2009

    Arnold Neumaier reports:

    The “Views: Print” feature in the nLab does not work properly. It prints from the discussion part only the piece directly visible in the corresponding windows.

    Jacques Distler replied immediately afterwards:

    The print view works perfectly fine with CSS rules that it knows about. It has no way of knowing about the CSS styling of “query boxes” and, so, no reason to change that styling for printing.

    The correct statement of your complaint is: query boxes don’t work, as one would wish them to, in the print view.

    It would be quite simple, for instance, for y’all to replace

      div.query { ... }

    with something more fine-grained, like

      div.query { ... }
      #revision div.query { ... }

    But, again, it’s totally up to you to ensure that the CSS feature you add to the nLab work correctly in the various views.

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorAndrew Stacey
    • CommentTimeSep 28th 2009

    And your point is ... ?

    Someone needs to sort out the CSS and, more generally, the design of the n-lab. Currently it's very dull and flat. I guess that there's more exciting things to be doing, but this is important to sort out. Is there anyone out there with even a modicum of good design sense who would be willing to take this on?

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
    • CommentTimeSep 28th 2009

    And your point is ... ?

    If that's addressed to me, my point is just that the conversation happened and should happen here. But Arnold and Jacques did not come by, so … nothing happened.

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorAndrew Stacey
    • CommentTimeSep 29th 2009

    Ah, okay. It read a bit like one of those "Someone ought to fix this". I was fairly sure that you would never be guilty of writing that, but I didn't want the precedent set.