Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory internal-categories k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeFeb 22nd 2010
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: Markdownstarted [[formal dg-algebra]]

   started formal dg-algebra

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeFeb 22nd 2010
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: Markdownexpanded a bit more In the old Sullivan reference the condition for A to be formal is that there is a quasi-iso <latex> A \to H^\bullet(A) </latex>. In newer references, such as the survey by Kathry Hess, it says instead that there is a span of quasi-isos between <latex>A</latex> and <latex> H^\bullet(A) </latex>. Since in the model structure on dg-algebras all objects are fibrant, I take it that this is equivalent to saying that <latex> A </latex> and <latex> H^\bullet(A)</latex> are isomorphic in the homotopy category. This is the way I state the definition now. But check if I am mixed up.

   expanded a bit more

   In the old Sullivan reference the condition for A to be formal is that there is a quasi-iso .

   In newer references, such as the survey by Kathry Hess, it says instead that there is a span of quasi-isos between and . Since in the model structure on dg-algebras all objects are fibrant, I take it that this is equivalent to saying that and are isomorphic in the homotopy category. This is the way I state the definition now. But check if I am mixed up.