Not signed in (Sign In)

Start a new discussion

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Discussion Tag Cloud

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeOct 23rd 2017

    gave Schwartz kernel theorem some minimal content

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeOct 24th 2017
    • (edited Oct 24th 2017)

    I am wondering now if we may lift the Schwartz kernel theorem to morphisms in H=\mathbf{H} = smooth sets or in H\mathbf{H} the Cahier topos, under the identification discussed at distributions are the smooth linear functionals.

    So conjecturally \mathbb{R}-linear morphisms in H\mathbf{H} of the form

    [ n,] [ n,] \left[ \mathbb{R}^n, \mathbb{R} \right] \otimes_{\mathbb{R}} \left[ \mathbb{R}^n, \mathbb{R} \right] \longrightarrow \mathbb{R}

    should be in linear bijection with \mathbb{R}-linear morphisms in H\mathbf{H} of the form

    n× n \mathbb{R}^n \times \mathbb{R}^n \longrightarrow \mathbb{R}

    The would-be proof would first observe that by Cartesian closure the former are equivalent to \mathbb{R}-linear morphisms of the form

    [ n,][[ n,],] . [\mathbb{R}^n, \mathbb{R}] \longrightarrow \left[ [\mathbb{R}^n, \mathbb{R}], \mathbb{R} \right]_{\mathbb{R}} \,.

    Using on the right that distributions are the smooth linear functionals this is smooth functions from the space of smooth functions to that of compactly supported distributions.

    Now IF that identification would also apply here (i.e. where the codomain is not \mathbb{R}, but a space of distributions), we would conclude that this is the same as the continuous linear functions

    ( n)( n) \mathcal{E}(\mathbb{R}^n) \longrightarrow \mathcal{E}'(\mathbb{R}^n)

    The Schwartz kernel theorem would then identify this with ( n× n)\mathcal{E}'(\mathbb{R}^n \times \mathbb{R}^n) which, once more, is the same as \mathbb{R}-linear morphisms in H\mathbf{H} of the form.

    [ n× n,] n. \left[\mathbb{R}^n \times \mathbb{R}^n , \mathbb{R} \right] \longrightarrow \mathbb{R}^n \,.

    Hence the question is:

    Does the proof of

    H([ n,],) ( n) \mathbf{H}\left( [\mathbb{R}^n, \mathbb{R}], \mathbb{R} \right)_{\mathbb{R}} \;\simeq\; \mathcal{E}'(\mathbb{R}^n)

    generalize to yield

    H([ n,],[[ n,],] ) ( n,( n)) \mathbf{H}\left( [\mathbb{R}^n, \mathbb{R}],\,\, [[\mathbb{R}^n, \mathbb{R}],\mathbb{R}]_{\mathbb{R}} \right)_{\mathbb{R}} \;\simeq\; \mathcal{E}'(\mathbb{R}^n, \mathcal{E}'(\mathbb{R}^n))

    ??

Add your comments
  • Please log in or leave your comment as a "guest post". If commenting as a "guest", please include your name in the message as a courtesy. Note: only certain categories allow guest posts.
  • To produce a hyperlink to an nLab entry, simply put double square brackets around its name, e.g. [[category]]. To use (La)TeX mathematics in your post, make sure Markdown+Itex is selected below and put your mathematics between dollar signs as usual. Only a subset of the usual TeX math commands are accepted: see here for a list.

  • (Help)