Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below
Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
started cubical type theory using a comment by Jonathan Sterling
Which part of the entry is the quote?
everything below “quoting Jonathan Sterling”.
I have pointed him to the entry, so that he can edit as need be.
Thanks, Urs! I’ve made a minor clarification. Soon, I may add more to this page to reflect the work done by two groups here at CMU on cartesian versions of cubical type theory.
@spitters This new one is still not equivalent to simplicial sets right?
Added reference
Ah, ’normalization’ is a redirect for normal variety. This is misleading the link at sequent calculus too.
What do people reckon is the best way to disambiguate?
I don’t think there is ambiguity in disambiguation. Made a start here: normalization.
Thanks. I hadn’t seen we have appropriate other entries, such as normal form.
cubical type theory is certainly not a “homotopy type theory in which univalence is not just an axiom but a theorem”. There exist extensional cubical type theories such as XTT where UIP is a theorem, not an axiom.
adding reference
Anonymous
Added some material that was at boundary (type theory)
1 to 29 of 29