Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry beauty bundles calculus categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-theory cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics comma complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive constructive-mathematics cosmology definitions deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry differential-topology digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration finite foundations functional-analysis functor galois-theory gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry goodwillie-calculus graph graphs gravity group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory internal-categories k-theory lie-theory limit limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic manifolds mathematics measure-theory modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology newpage noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory string-theory subobject superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorm
    • CommentTimeNov 30th 2017
    • (edited Nov 30th 2017)

    The category of topological spaces fully faithfully embeds into the category of simplicial objects of the category of filters, where “the category of filters” means the full subcategory of topological spaces consisting of spaces such that any superset of a non-empty open subset is open (details below).

    The embedding is essentially the definition of a topological space in terms of neighbourhood systems, e.g. (Bourbaki, General Topology, IS1.2,Ax.(V I)(V IV)I\S1.2,Ax.(V_I)-(V_IV)).

    Do you know any references this embedding or the category of simplicial objects in the category of filters, perhaps under another name? I was not able to find any; nlab does not seem to have an entry for either the category of filters or its simplicial category.

    I sketch the construction below and a couple of open questions it leads to. More details appear in a research proposal [1], along with a number of questions. Little attempt is made to answer these questions, as probably they are already well-known.

    The embedding t:TopsFiltt:Top\longrightarrow sFilt into the category sFiltsFilt of simplicial objects in the category FiltFilt of filters:

    set-wise a space X is sent to (|X|,|X|×|X|,|X|×|X|×|X|,....)(|X|, |X|\times |X|,|X|\times |X|\times |X|,....),

    where |X||X| is the set of points of XX

    connecting maps are coordinate maps,

    filters on |X| n|X|^n are defined as follows:

    a subset UU of |X||X| is big iff U=XU=X

    a subset UU of |X|×|X||X|\times |X| is big iff each point xx of XX has an open neighbourhood U xU_x such that {x}×U xU\{x\}\times U_x \subset U.

    for n3n \ge 3, the filter on |X| n|X|^n is the coarsest filter such that all coordinate maps |X| n|X|×|X||X|^n-\longrightarrow |X|\times |X| are continuous wrt the topology on |X|×|X||X|\times |X| defined above.

    There is a similar but simpler embedding of metric spaces with uniformly continuous maps: a subset of |X| n|X|^n is big iff it contains an ε\epsilon-neighbourhood of the diagonal for some ε\epsilon.

    Two open questions:

    1. Is there a model structure on the larger category compatible with a model structure on topological spaces?

    2. Topological spaces, metric (uniform) spaces and filters all “live” in the same larger category, and this allows to use language of category theory to talk about compactness, precompactness, completeness, and equicontinuity. Can one reformulate and prove Arzela-Ascoli theorem category-theoretically?

      Here is an example of use of the language.

      A sequence f i:XMf_i:X\longrightarrow M of functions from a topological space XX to a metric space MM is equicontinuous iff the following morphism is well-defined:

      i({ω})×t(X)m(M)i(\{\omega\}) \times t(X) \longrightarrow m(M) (i,x)f i(x)(i,x) \mapsto f_i(x)

      A sequence f i:XMf_i:X\longrightarrow M of functions from a metric space XX to a metric space MM is uniformly equicontinuous iff the following morphism is well-defined:

      i({ω})×m(X)m(M)i(\{\omega\}) \times m(X) \longrightarrow m(M) (i,x)f i(x)(i,x) \mapsto f_i(x)

      A sequence f i:XMf_i:X\longrightarrow M of functions from a metric space XX to a metric space MM is uniformly Cauchy iff the following morphism is well-defined:

      E(ω cofinite)×m(X)m(M)E(\omega_{cofinite}) \times m(X) \longrightarrow m(M) (i,x)f i(x)(i,x) \mapsto f_i(x)

      Here t:TopsFiltt:Top\longrightarrow sFilt, m:UniformSpacessFiltm:UniformSpaces\longrightarrow sFilt are the two embeddings mentioned above into the category sFiltsFilt of simplicial objects in the category FiltFilt of filters;

      ω cofinite\omega_{cofinite} is the filter of cofinite subsets of ω\omega; {ω}\{\omega\} is the filter on ω\omega with only one big subset ω\omega itself;

      the functor i:FiltsFilti:Filt\longrightarrow sFilt, F(F,F,F,...)F\mapsto (F,F,F,...) with connecting maps being always identity, the functor E:FiltsFiltE:Filt\longrightarrow sFilt, F(F,F×F,F×F×F,...)F\mapsto (F,F\times F,F\times F\times F,...) sends a filter into the sequence of its Cartesian powers with coordinate maps.


    [1] Topological and metric spaces as full subcategories of the category of simplicial objects of the category of filters. A draft of a research proposal

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeDec 1st 2017

    Well, at least the “definition of a topological space in terms of neighbourhood systems” is at pretopological space.

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorm
    • CommentTimeDec 20th 2017
    Well, it doesn't use the simplicial language to describe this definition, which is what I am after. Though I do not see how to view
    a pretopological space as a simplicial object of a category (in the description above, in a pretopological space
    face and degeneracy maps are no longer necessarily continuous).