Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Discussion Tag Cloud

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJan 6th 2018

    at Schwinger-Dyson equation I have added the statement, a word on the interpretation, and references

    then I added details and proof of the Schwinger-Dyson equation (following Rejzner 16, remark 7.7) at BV-operator: here

  1. Corrected typo in reference to the Schwinger-Dyson equation in Heanneaux’s book.

    Ivan Burbano

    diff, v10, current

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeDec 18th 2023
    • (edited Dec 18th 2023)

    Just since I recently noticed it while going through historical articles:

    I think the gist of the Dyson-Schwinger equation is already equation (46) in:

    Already earlier in the thesis

    the corresponding manipulations are used in examples, but maybe the thesis does not contain the explicit general formula.

    diff, v12, current