Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Discussion Tag Cloud

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJan 10th 2018
    • (edited Jan 10th 2018)

    I have started spelling out details at quantum master equation, following the rigorous derivation in causal perturbation theory due to Fredenhagen-Rejzner 11b, Rejzner 11.

    So far I have added some backgound infrastructure and then the proof of this theorem ((Rejzner 11, (5.35) - (5.38)):


    Consider an adiabatically switched non-point-interaction action functional in the form of a regular polynomial observable

    SintPolyObs(EBV-BRST)reg[[]],

    Then the following are equivalent:

    1. The quantum master equation (QME)

      12{S+Sint,S+Sint}𝒯+iΔBV(S+Sint)=0

      holds on regular polynomial observables.

    2. The perturbative S-matrix on regular polynomial observables is BV-closed

      {S,𝒮(Sint)}=0.

    Moreover, if these equivalent conditions hold, then the interacting quantum BV-differential is equal, up to a sign, to the sum of the time-ordered antibracket with the total action functional S+Sint and i times the BV-operator:

    {S,()}1=({S+Sint,()}𝒯+iΔBV)