Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology definitions deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).

nLab > Latest Changes: Philip Gibbs

Bottom of Page

1 to 8 of 8

  1.  
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeApr 2nd 2018

    For the discussion at Higgs field I created a category:people entry for Philip Gibbs, who was about the first to discuss the Higgs detection at LHC.

    diff, v1, current

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeApr 2nd 2018

    Hmm, looks like the edit announcer had some difficulty with this one.

  3. Indeed! Please leave it as it is Urs, if that’s OK, as I should find some time to debug and fix later.

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorRichard Williamson
    • CommentTimeApr 2nd 2018
    • (edited Apr 2nd 2018)

    In the case of page creation (as opposed to editing of a page), there was a bug in the code which creates the links back to the created page. Should now be fixed. I also fixed #1 itself.

    This was the first time the announcer has been used for a page creation, except for test purposes.

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeApr 2nd 2018
    • (edited Apr 2nd 2018)

    Thanks, Richard!

    BTW, somebody might want to add to the entry that Philip Gibbs is the creator of vixra.org.

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeApr 3rd 2018

    Are there any examples of papers being submitted to vixra after being rejected from arxiv and then later found to be valuable?

    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeApr 3rd 2018
    • (edited Apr 3rd 2018)

    I never looked into this issue, but Google tells me that this question has occurred to others before, say at Quora where it has a thread: Are there any serious papers on viXra?. The reply by Philip Gibbs might be expected to be biased, but seems to me a very informative, balanced and thoughtful read.

    [edit: now that I am at it, I could just as well add that link to the entry on Philip Gibbs. done now]

    • CommentRowNumber8.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeApr 3rd 2018

    Yes, a good read. Thanks.

    Disciplinary boundary maintenance is a problematic business. The story of how scientists looked to belittle Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation is a great case for those supporting outsiders.

1 to 8 of 8

  1.