Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below
Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
added a bit more and re-structured a little.
One would think the main point that the reviews of the computer simulations would highlight is to which extend the simulation matches observation, and what the discrepancies are that remain to be explained. But I have trouble finding much about this (there is this quote) among plenty discussion of how many CPU cores have been used. (A common laymen pitfall when computer simulations enter research, but here with big international collaborations?)
But then, I haven’t really spent that much time searching around. If anyone has better pointers, please let me know.
ah, Springel 13 is the kind of quick but substantial review that I was hoping for
added pointer to this recent set of slides:
This is a talk for a non-expert general audience, but nicely done.
should add pointer to this talk recording Hopkins 17
added this pointer:
added pointers to one more simulation project:
Pierre Ocvirk et al. , Cosmic Dawn (CoDa): the First Radiation-Hydrodynamics Simulation of Reionization and Galaxy Formation in the Local Universe (arXiv:1511.00011)
Pierre Ocvirk, et al., Cosmic Dawn II (CoDa II): a new radiation-hydrodynamics simulation of the self-consistent coupling of galaxy formation and reionization (arXiv:1811.11192)
1 to 12 of 12