Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory internal-categories k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).

nLab > Latest Changes: two-level type theory

Bottom of Page

1 to 8 of 8

  1.  
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeApr 16th 2018

    A stub so far.

    v1, current

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeApr 16th 2018
    • (edited Apr 16th 2018)

    Notice that we already have an entry Homotopy Type System, which is the same kind of idea.

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeApr 16th 2018

    Ah ok. The second reference’s abstract says

    The idea of two-level type theory is heavily inspired by Voevodsky’s Homotopy Type System (HTS). Two-level type theory can be thought of as a version of HTS without equality reflection. We show that the lack of equality reflection does not hinder the development of the ideas that HTS was designed for.

    Does this merit a distinct entry then?

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeApr 16th 2018

    Sorry, I forgot about that page.

    I would lean towards folding Homotopy Type System into two-level type theory. Unfortunately, “2LTT” seems to be being used both as a general term for type theories with both exact and path equality types, and also a name for the specific ACK system. The general term includes not just ACK and HTS but also the “computational cubical type theory” of Harper-Angiuli et. al. Nearly everything we currently have at Homotopy Type System applies more generally to all two-level type theories, and right now it seems that ACK and CCTT are receiving more active work than HTS. (In particular, HTS has the disadvantage of undecidable type-checking, which ACK restores by leaving out equality reflection in favor of UIP – for CCTT I’m not sure, that may not be a relevant question for the sort of type theory that it is.)

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeApr 17th 2018

    I added a link to Homotopy Type System. I’ll leave it to experts to arrange what they take to be the proper relation between these pages.

    diff, v2, current

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeApr 17th 2018

    folded HTS into this page

    diff, v3, current

    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeApr 17th 2018

    I also added some discussion of the issue of fibrant vs non-fibrant nat.

  8. removed duplicate redirects (fibrant types used to redirect to here and to fibrant type)

    Anonymouse

    diff, v10, current

1 to 8 of 8

  1.