Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology definitions deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeApr 25th 2018
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexthis table used to be hidden at _[[supersymmetry]]_, but it really ought to cross-link its entries. Therefore here its stand-alone version, for !inclusion <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/superconformal+symmetry+--+table/1">v1</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/superconformal+symmetry+--+table">current</a>

   this table used to be hidden at supersymmetry, but it really ought to cross-link its entries. Therefore here its stand-alone version, for !inclusion

   v1, current

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorDavidRoberts
   • CommentTimeApr 30th 2019
   • PermaLink
   Author: DavidRoberts
   Format: MarkdownItexThere are a bunch of supergroups here that use $/$ instead of what I guess should be $\vert$, but it's not clear.

   There are a bunch of supergroups here that use $/$ instead of what I guess should be $\vert$, but it’s not clear.

3. • CommentRowNumber3.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeApr 30th 2019
   • (edited Apr 30th 2019)
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexTrue, we could try to harmonize. The slash in the definition of the [[orthosymplectic supergroup]] is written both ways in the literature, fairly evenly distributed, I think. We could either make the slashes here be straight or those at _[[orthosymplectic supergroup]]_ be slanted. But I guess I would agree and also prefer having them straight here.

   True, we could try to harmonize. The slash in the definition of the orthosymplectic supergroup is written both ways in the literature, fairly evenly distributed, I think.

   We could either make the slashes here be straight or those at orthosymplectic supergroup be slanted.

   But I guess I would agree and also prefer having them straight here.

4. • CommentRowNumber4.
   • CommentAuthorDavidRoberts
   • CommentTimeApr 30th 2019
   • PermaLink
   Author: DavidRoberts
   Format: MarkdownItexThe reason it's not clear when $/$ is used is that in principle it could mean some integer that is the result of dividing the numbers as shown. Is $OSp(n/k)$ supposed to be some symmetry group involving $n/k$-dimensional space, or $(n\vert k)$-dimensional superspace? (question is rhetorical)

   The reason it’s not clear when $/$ is used is that in principle it could mean some integer that is the result of dividing the numbers as shown. Is $OSp(n/k)$ supposed to be some symmetry group involving $n/k$-dimensional space, or $(n\vert k)$-dimensional superspace? (question is rhetorical)

5. • CommentRowNumber5.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeApr 30th 2019
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexSure. Somebody has changed the notation to `\vert` now.

   Sure. Somebody has changed the notation to \vert now.

6. • CommentRowNumber6.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeSep 23rd 2019
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexfinally completed the row for D=5, adding pointer to _[[D4-brane]]_ and _[[D=5 SYM]]_ <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/diff/superconformal+symmetry+--+table/4">diff</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/superconformal+symmetry+--+table/4">v4</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/superconformal+symmetry+--+table">current</a>

   finally completed the row for D=5, adding pointer to D4-brane and D=5 SYM

   diff, v4, current

7. • CommentRowNumber7.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeOct 27th 2020
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexfixed previously broken link to [Nahm 78](https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/supersymmetry#Nahm78) <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/diff/superconformal+symmetry+--+table/5">diff</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/superconformal+symmetry+--+table/5">v5</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/superconformal+symmetry+--+table">current</a>

   fixed previously broken link to Nahm 78

   diff, v5, current