Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
  
  
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology definitions deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorRichard Williamson
   • CommentTimeApr 29th 2018
   • PermaLink
   Author: Richard Williamson
   Format: MarkdownItexAdded statement of the fact that any open subset of the underlying topological space of a scheme $X$, together with the sheaf of commutative rings on it obtained by restriction of the structure sheaf on $X$, defines an open subscheme of $X$. Began proof, but not finished yet. Whilst the proof is straightforward, there is something to show; it is not completely trivial. <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/diff/open+subscheme/4">diff</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/open+subscheme/4">v4</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/open+subscheme">current</a>

   Added statement of the fact that any open subset of the underlying topological space of a scheme , together with the sheaf of commutative rings on it obtained by restriction of the structure sheaf on , defines an open subscheme of . Began proof, but not finished yet. Whilst the proof is straightforward, there is something to show; it is not completely trivial.

   diff, v4, current

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorRichard Williamson
   • CommentTimeApr 29th 2018
   • (edited Apr 29th 2018)
   • PermaLink
   Author: Richard Williamson
   Format: MarkdownItexCompleted the proof, modulo a couple of basic pieces of commutative algebra. Would be great if someone finds time to write up these (on a different page)! I tried to be a little more careful than seems to be typically the case (compare for example the proof in EGA I (Proposition 2.1.3 in Chapter I) or the [stacks project](https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/01II), Lemma 25.9.2), keeping track of the isomorphism between $N$ and $Spec A$, and mentioning some points which one needs to convince oneself are true. <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/diff/open+subscheme/5">diff</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/open+subscheme/5">v5</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/open+subscheme">current</a>

   Completed the proof, modulo a couple of basic pieces of commutative algebra. Would be great if someone finds time to write up these (on a different page)! I tried to be a little more careful than seems to be typically the case (compare for example the proof in EGA I (Proposition 2.1.3 in Chapter I) or the stacks project, Lemma 25.9.2), keeping track of the isomorphism between and , and mentioning some points which one needs to convince oneself are true.

   diff, v5, current