Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry beauty bundles calculus categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology combinatorics comma complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive constructive-mathematics cosmology definitions deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry differential-topology digraphs duality education elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration finite foundations functional-analysis functor galois-theory gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry goodwillie-calculus graph graphs gravity group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory infinity integration integration-theory k-theory lie lie-theory limit limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic manifolds mathematics measure-theory modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pasting philosophy physics planar pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string-theory subobject superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topological topology topos topos-theory type type-theory variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorHarry Gindi
    • CommentTimeMay 12th 2018

    A while back, a friend of mine mentioned that Lax n-functors between strict n-categories are related to maps between the associated (unmarked) Street Nerves in the 2-categorical case at least. Is the correspondence bijective? If it is, does it generalize to the case n>2? If it isn’t, can we identify a particular subset of simplicial maps between the nerves that arise from lax functors in the case n=2? In the case n>2?

    If so, I think it would be nice to add this to the nLab. The only source I have found on this is a paper of Jonathan Chiche, but he only seems to use the fact that lax 2-functors give rise to maps on the Street nerves in order to define weak equivalences (a lax functor is called a weak equivalence if the induced map on Street nerves is a weak equivalence of simplicial sets).

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeMay 12th 2018

    I think the correspondence is bijective on normal lax 2-functors. I believe Nick Gurski proved this, but I don’t know whether he ever published it. For n>2n\gt 2 I don’t even know exactly what a “lax nn-functor” is. Is it lax at all dimensions simultaneously? How do the constraints interact?

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorHarry Gindi
    • CommentTimeMay 12th 2018
    • (edited May 12th 2018)

    I guess I meant normal lax functors, since this is, I believe, what Chiche was using.

    I’ll send Nick an e-mail maybe.Thanks!