Author: TobyBartels Format: MarkdownItexI got rid of the old wedge products of $\mathrm{d}s$, which never worked out, and put $\mathrm{d}S$ in terms of $\mathrm{d}\mathbf{x}$ rather than $\mathrm{d}s$.
<a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/diff/absolute+differential+form/18">diff</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/absolute+differential+form/18">v18</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/absolute+differential+form">current</a>
I got rid of the old wedge products of , which never worked out, and put in terms of rather than .
Author: TobyBartels Format: MarkdownItexSpell out why there is no formula for $\mathrm{d}S$ using $\mathrm{d}s$, even though the latter determines the former.
<a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/diff/absolute+differential+form/19">diff</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/absolute+differential+form/19">v19</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/absolute+differential+form">current</a>
Spell out why there is no formula for using , even though the latter determines the former.