Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory internal-categories k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorDavidRoberts
   • CommentTimeMay 25th 2018
   • PermaLink
   Author: DavidRoberts
   Format: MarkdownItexThe inductive tensor product is the analogue of the projective tensor product where we have a universal property wrt separately continuous maps. For Fréchet spaces they agree. <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/inductive+tensor+product/1">v1</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/inductive+tensor+product">current</a>

   The inductive tensor product is the analogue of the projective tensor product where we have a universal property wrt separately continuous maps. For Fréchet spaces they agree.

   v1, current

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorDavidRoberts
   • CommentTimeMay 25th 2018
   • PermaLink
   Author: DavidRoberts
   Format: MarkdownItexAdded floating toc and contents. <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/inductive+tensor+product/1">v1</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/inductive+tensor+product">current</a>

   Added floating toc and contents.

   v1, current

3. • CommentRowNumber3.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeMay 25th 2018
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexadded a bunch of hyperlinks to various technical terms in the first few paragraphs. in particular I made sure that there are links back to _[[tensor product]]_ and _[[tensor product of vector spaces]]_. Conversely, I made these entries also point to _[[inductive tensor product]]_ <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/diff/inductive+tensor+product/2">diff</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/inductive+tensor+product/2">v2</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/inductive+tensor+product">current</a>

   added a bunch of hyperlinks to various technical terms in the first few paragraphs. in particular I made sure that there are links back to tensor product and tensor product of vector spaces. Conversely, I made these entries also point to inductive tensor product

   diff, v2, current

4. • CommentRowNumber4.
   • CommentAuthorDavidRoberts
   • CommentTimeMay 30th 2018
   • PermaLink
   Author: DavidRoberts
   Format: MarkdownItexAdded original reference to Grothendieck's nuclear spaces monograph, added theorem about further properties: the tensor product commutes with inductive limits and makes $lctvs$ a symmetric monoidal closed category. <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/diff/inductive+tensor+product/3">diff</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/inductive+tensor+product/3">v3</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/inductive+tensor+product">current</a>

   Added original reference to Grothendieck’s nuclear spaces monograph, added theorem about further properties: the tensor product commutes with inductive limits and makes $lctvs$ a symmetric monoidal closed category.

   diff, v3, current

5. • CommentRowNumber5.
   • CommentAuthorDmitri Pavlov
   • CommentTimeMay 30th 2018
   • PermaLink
   Author: Dmitri Pavlov
   Format: MarkdownItexIs this result about lctvs as a closed symmetric monoidal category due to Grothendieck?

   Is this result about lctvs as a closed symmetric monoidal category due to Grothendieck?

6. • CommentRowNumber6.
   • CommentAuthorDavidRoberts
   • CommentTimeMay 30th 2018
   • (edited May 30th 2018)
   • PermaLink
   Author: DavidRoberts
   Format: MarkdownItexNot sure. I saw it in Ralf Meyer's book on cyclic homology, but it was a throwaway comment, together with the complaint that it's not very useful, due to the problem with the completed inductive tensor. Sydow, in _[On hom-functors and tensor products of topological vector spaces](https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0066910)_, dating from 1982, says "it is is easy to see".

   Not sure. I saw it in Ralf Meyer’s book on cyclic homology, but it was a throwaway comment, together with the complaint that it’s not very useful, due to the problem with the completed inductive tensor.

   Sydow, in On hom-functors and tensor products of topological vector spaces, dating from 1982, says “it is is easy to see”.

7. • CommentRowNumber7.
   • CommentAuthorDavidRoberts
   • CommentTimeMay 30th 2018
   • PermaLink
   Author: DavidRoberts
   Format: MarkdownItexAndrew Stacey talks through the issue in [this comment](https://golem.ph.utexas.edu/category/2008/01/comparative_smootheology.html#c015601) (and following) from ten or so years ago. He refers to [this book](https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1468-7) for details.

   Andrew Stacey talks through the issue in this comment (and following) from ten or so years ago. He refers to this book for details.