Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology definitions deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeJun 10th 2018
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexadded pointer to the slides [Licata 18](https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/adjoint+logic#Licata18) <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/diff/adjoint+logic/10">diff</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/adjoint+logic/10">v10</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/adjoint+logic">current</a>

   added pointer to the slides Licata 18

   diff, v10, current

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
   • CommentTimeAug 30th 2018
   • PermaLink
   Author: David_Corfield
   Format: MarkdownItexAdded the reference * Klaas Pruiksma, William Chargin, Frank Pfenning, and Jason Reed, _Adjoint Logic_, ([pdf](https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~fp/papers/adjoint18b.pdf)) They contrast their work with Mike's, writing > ...work by Licata et al. [16] elegantly generalizes Reed’s first and unpublished definition of adjoint logic [25] by providing more structure to the adjunctions. Briefly, the preorder of modes is replaced by a 2-category, which allows the faithful representation of additional examples (for example, all of judgmental S4 instead of just its normal fragment), including some constructions in homotopy type theory. They also provide a detailed categorical semantics. However, the independence principle upon which ADJ is based is only an emergent property of some mode structures, which in some cases leads to more complicated adequacy proofs. Also, they do not investigate focusing or polarization. <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/diff/adjoint+logic/11">diff</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/adjoint+logic/11">v11</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/adjoint+logic">current</a>

   Added the reference

   • Klaas Pruiksma, William Chargin, Frank Pfenning, and Jason Reed, Adjoint Logic, (pdf)

   They contrast their work with Mike’s, writing

   …work by Licata et al. [16] elegantly generalizes Reed’s first and unpublished definition of adjoint logic [25] by providing more structure to the adjunctions. Briefly, the preorder of modes is replaced by a 2-category, which allows the faithful representation of additional examples (for example, all of judgmental S4 instead of just its normal fragment), including some constructions in homotopy type theory. They also provide a detailed categorical semantics. However, the independence principle upon which ADJ is based is only an emergent property of some mode structures, which in some cases leads to more complicated adequacy proofs. Also, they do not investigate focusing or polarization.

   diff, v11, current

3. • CommentRowNumber3.
   • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
   • CommentTimeOct 11th 2018
   • PermaLink
   Author: David_Corfield
   Format: MarkdownItexWhat happens when adjoint logic meets game semantics? Could we have players operating in a number of arenas where different game rules apply? So we might have a classical arena and an intuitionistic one, Class and Int. The existence of a strategy for a proposition in Class corresponds to a strategy for the double negation translated version in Int. But you might have a single game distributed over the arenas.

   What happens when adjoint logic meets game semantics? Could we have players operating in a number of arenas where different game rules apply? So we might have a classical arena and an intuitionistic one, Class and Int. The existence of a strategy for a proposition in Class corresponds to a strategy for the double negation translated version in Int. But you might have a single game distributed over the arenas.