Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory internal-categories k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorzskoda
   • CommentTimeMar 3rd 2010
   • (edited Mar 3rd 2010)
   • PermaLink
   Author: zskoda
   Format: Markdown[[Thomas Nikolaus|Thomas]]'s guest post at cafe and his paper should maybe be reflected in entry [[infinity-category]] and other places in nlab where various "models" fro infinity categories are listed, as it should have a very important role in my opinion, but still better experts should do carefully these changes. I might give a slightly uninformed interepretation of the role of this work in comparison to the experts like Mike.

   Thomas's guest post at cafe and his paper should maybe be reflected in entry infinity-category and other places in nlab where various "models" fro infinity categories are listed, as it should have a very important role in my opinion, but still better experts should do carefully these changes. I might give a slightly uninformed interepretation of the role of this work in comparison to the experts like Mike.

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorTim_Porter
   • CommentTimeMar 3rd 2010
   • PermaLink
   Author: Tim_Porter
   Format: MarkdownI suspect that Thomas's models are free not only in the sense that he ascribes to them. For instance, [[simplicial T-complex]]es would seem to form a 'variety' in his category of algebraic Kan complexes where the equations satisfied are the three axioms of those beasties.

   I suspect that Thomas's models are free not only in the sense that he ascribes to them. For instance, simplicial T-complexes would seem to form a 'variety' in his category of algebraic Kan complexes where the equations satisfied are the three axioms of those beasties.

3. • CommentRowNumber3.
   • CommentAuthorTim_Porter
   • CommentTimeMar 3rd 2010
   • PermaLink
   Author: Tim_Porter
   Format: MarkdownTo help a bit to see how Thomas's work fits into the general framework, I have been doing a bit of maintenance work on [[simplicial T-complexes]] and [[crossed complexes]], including mention of the nerve of a crossed complex.

   To help a bit to see how Thomas's work fits into the general framework, I have been doing a bit of maintenance work on simplicial T-complexes and crossed complexes, including mention of the nerve of a crossed complex.

4. • CommentRowNumber4.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeMar 3rd 2010
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownThanks, Tim. Could one maybe add a remark about results about simplicial T-complexes? We have the definition, and, as you amplify, it is more restrcitve than just saying that for every horn a filler has been chosen. So it would be good to understand what the extra conditions accomplish. What is it they allow to prove? Or generally, what did people in the literature accomplish or try to accomplish with simplicial T-complexes. Remarks on questions like this might be good at [[simplicial T-complex]].

   Thanks, Tim.

   Could one maybe add a remark about results about simplicial T-complexes? We have the definition, and, as you amplify, it is more restrcitve than just saying that for every horn a filler has been chosen. So it would be good to understand what the extra conditions accomplish. What is it they allow to prove? Or generally, what did people in the literature accomplish or try to accomplish with simplicial T-complexes.

   Remarks on questions like this might be good at simplicial T-complex.

5. • CommentRowNumber5.
   • CommentAuthorTim_Porter
   • CommentTimeFeb 17th 2019
   • PermaLink
   Author: Tim_Porter
   Format: MarkdownItexUpdated Thomas's Homepage as the link was dead. <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/diff/Thomas+Nikolaus/17">diff</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/Thomas+Nikolaus/17">v17</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/Thomas+Nikolaus">current</a>

   Updated Thomas’s Homepage as the link was dead.

   diff, v17, current