Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology definitions deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).

Atrium > Mathematics, Physics & Philosophy: Reference for pullback-preserving comonads inducing topoi

Bottom of Page

1 to 4 of 4

  1.  
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorSridharRamesh
    • CommentTimeMar 4th 2010
    In Todd Trimble's article "Three topos theorems in one" on his private area of the nlab, he asks for a published reference for the result that the category of coalgebras for a pullback-preserving comonad on a topos is itself a topos. I'm not sure if he's still interested, but in case he is, Remark 4.2.3 in section A of Sketches of an Elephant points out precisely this fact. (I originally thought I would simply edit the article to provide the reference, but was unable to do so, lacking editing privileges on Todd's private area. Then I thought I'd e-mail Todd to let him know, but couldn't find his e-mail address. So, finally, I settled for posting this on the forum, as presumably the next best thing)
    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMar 4th 2010

    as presumably the next best thing

    Or even the best thing! :-)

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorTodd_Trimble
    • CommentTimeMar 4th 2010
    • (edited Mar 4th 2010)

    Thanks, Sridhar! I should have edited this in already; Mike Shulman told me this some time ago. Sorry to make people duplicate efforts. (I've got to get hold of that Elephant! Does it say who first observed this fact?)

    In case someone wants to reach me, they can do so at topological.musings@gmail.com. But I agree with Urs that writing here is often best.

    [Edit: the article now has the reference.]

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorSridharRamesh
    • CommentTimeMar 4th 2010
    Ah, yeah, I thought you might've already found it by now. Alas, it does not say who first made the observation.

1 to 4 of 4

  1.