Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-categories 2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry bundles calculus categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-theory cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics comma complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry differential-topology digraphs duality education elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration finite foundations functional-analysis functor galois-theory gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory infinity integration integration-theory k-theory lie lie-theory limit limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal-logic model model-category-theory monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology multicategories nonassociative noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pasting philosophy physics planar pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory string string-theory subobject superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorDmitri Pavlov
    • CommentTimeAug 8th 2018

    Consider a model category M and a bifibrant replacement functor R: M→M.

    Define a new category M’ with the same objects as M by setting hom_M’(X,Y) := hom_M(R(X),R(Y)), with the obvious notions of composition and identity.

    The category M’ behaves in an intuitively correct way: homotopies are well-behaved, homotopy classes of pointed maps S^n→X compute the homotopy groups of X, etc.

    What would be a good name for morphisms of M’?

    For instance, one could say for M=sSet:

    for any integer d there is a (⋯) map S^n→S^n of degree d, where S^n=Δ^n/∂Δ^n is the standard simplicial sphere.

    What would be a good substitute for (⋯)?

    I am currently considering “weak map” and “derived map”, and possibly “∞-map”, but perhaps there are better alternatives.

    Of course, one could say “a point in the derived mapping space”, but this is a rather awkward name for such a simple idea.

    I do not want to restrict to bifibrant objects in M (where one could talk about ordinary maps in M), since in the case M=sSet this would eliminate all finite nondiscrete simplicial sets, which are an important source of examples.

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeAug 9th 2018

    I think ’weak’ and ’derived’ are reasonable adjectives. Stretching an analogy one might also call it an ’ana-map’.

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorDmitri Pavlov
    • CommentTimeAug 9th 2018
    • (edited Aug 9th 2018)

    I just discovered that the page homotopical cohomology theory (a rather weird name) refers to a similar concept as ana-morphisms, using zigzags instead of bifibrant replacements.

    And Urs refers to these as ∞-anafunctors in DCCT, §

    Considering the centrality of this concept for everything that concerns homotopy theory, a standardized name would be highly beneficial.

    Perhaps a reasonable choice would be to refer to 0-simplices of homs of hammock localizations as anamaps. Anamaps organize into a category, there is a natural notion of homotopy of anamaps (namely, a zigzag of 1-simplices in the above homs), and if an anamap is a weak equivalence (i.e., becomes invertible in the homotopy category), then it is invertible up to a homotopy.