Not signed in (Sign In)

Start a new discussion

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry beauty bundles calculus categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-theory cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology definitions deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration finite foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry goodwillie-calculus graph graphs gravity group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory history homological homological-algebra homology homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory internal-categories k-theory kan lie lie-theory limit limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology newpage noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pasting philosophy physics planar pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeSep 10th 2018
    • (edited Sep 10th 2018)

    table highlighting the pattern in the “Segal completion theorems”: Atiyah-Segal completion theorem and Segal-Carlsson completion theorem. Not a stand-alone entry, but for !inclusion into the various entries that the table relates to

    v1, current

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeSep 11th 2018

    added another row to the table for the Rector completion theorem

    diff, v4, current

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeSep 12th 2018

    This table is one example of many nLab pages that are rendered properly only with Firefox.

    Since I am receiving emails about problems, I am wondering if it might be worthwhile to add a general remark to all nLab pages. Something like “best viewed with Firefox”, or the like.

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorRichard Williamson
    • CommentTimeSep 12th 2018
    • (edited Sep 12th 2018)

    Yes, MathJax cannot seem to parse links within mathematics, it is only browsers that are rendering the MathML directly that seem to be able to do so. I have seen the problem most often in tables. I am not aware of any other significant cases, I think.

    This is very unfortunate, but I personally would be reluctant to add such a remark to all pages. I for example never use Firefox (except occasionally when testing) , and have no problems for almost all pages I look at. Also on a mobile, for instance, one does not have the possibility to use Firefox.

    I would suggest to instead flag the particular cases where there is an issue (links within mathematics, for instance) on the Technical TODO list (nlabmeta). I have been working on a new TeX renderer which is neither MathJax nor itex2MML, and this kind of thing could be one place where I could try to introduce it, maybe in such a way that the MathML is still used on Firefox.

    Please feel free to forward relevant sections of emails to me, either over email itself or here on the nForum.

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeSep 12th 2018

    Also on a mobile, for instance, one does not have the possibility to use Firefox.

    Interesting that you say that. I use Firefox on my phone all the time. Because with Chrome on my phone, all the math formulas on the nLab come out tiny and with lacking whitespace.

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorRichard Williamson
    • CommentTimeSep 12th 2018
    • (edited Sep 12th 2018)

    Ah, apologies, that was nonsense. I believe it is very little used relative to other mobile browsers, though. You are correct about the formulas, I would regard this as a ’bug’ in MathJax, although it is hard to fix; I have encountered the same in my experiments with a new renderer: one wishes to use ’inline-block’ in the CSS to prevent the mathematics from being split at line breaks, but this seems to cause the behaviour you describe in some cases, especially on a mobile. So I am just allowing line breaks at the moment. See for example foundation of mathematics, where I have used my new renderer: the mathematics (e.g. the inline diagram after the words ’specific product cone’) displays fine for me in Chrome on a mobile, but looks like you describe if MathJax is used.

    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorAlizter
    • CommentTimeSep 13th 2018
    The formulae say "unknown node type" and are not rednering properly.
    • CommentRowNumber8.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeSep 13th 2018
    • (edited Sep 13th 2018)

    Yeah, that’s for non-Firefox browsers. Elsewhere I was suggesting to add a general alert to pages, that only Firefox renders the nLab properly.

    • CommentRowNumber9.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeOct 5th 2018

    I see from Equivariant stable homotopy theory that there’s a larger story here. First, that some of these completions for cohomology are accompanied by localizations for homology, e.g., for K-theory but not for cohomotopy. Second, that the completion/localization account works more broadly to include complex cobordism and modules over MUM U.

    I guess we could expand the table at least with the latter. What’s the equivariant complex cobordism ring of the point?

    [I was drawn here by a wish to reference someone using induced and coinduced actions for group homomorphisms.]

    • CommentRowNumber10.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeOct 24th 2018

    added a first line for equivariant ordinary cohomology – for completeness (…pun intended)

    diff, v6, current

    • CommentRowNumber11.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeOct 26th 2018

    As mentioned in #9, a similar completion has been found for MU (and its modules). So I added it to the table.

    diff, v7, current

    • CommentRowNumber12.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeOct 26th 2018

    Thanks, I seem to have missed #9 when you wrote it, and still when I wrote #10.

    But so we should add some pointer/citation with your new row in the table.

    • CommentRowNumber13.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeOct 26th 2018

    I don’t know if it has a name. Greenlees and May in Localization and Completion Theorems for MU-Module Spectra say Löffler sketched a proof and Comezana and May completed it.

    • CommentRowNumber14.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeOct 26th 2018

    would be good to find the reference, add the statement on the nLab, and then link to there from that table…

Add your comments
  • Please log in or leave your comment as a "guest post". If commenting as a "guest", please include your name in the message as a courtesy. Note: only certain categories allow guest posts.
  • To produce a hyperlink to an nLab entry, simply put double square brackets around its name, e.g. [[category]]. To use (La)TeX mathematics in your post, make sure Markdown+Itex is selected below and put your mathematics between dollar signs as usual. Only a subset of the usual TeX math commands are accepted: see here for a list.

  • (Help)