Not signed in (Sign In)

Start a new discussion

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive constructive-mathematics cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie lie-theory limit limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic manifolds mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory subobject superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeSep 22nd 2018
    • (edited Sep 22nd 2018)

    maded explicit the identification of equivariant stable homotopy groups with equivariant generalized cohomology groups of the point: here

    diff, v12, current

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeSep 22nd 2018

    Does the naive/genuine distinction correspond to anything from a linear HoTT perspective?

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeSep 22nd 2018
    • (edited Sep 22nd 2018)

    Yes, genuine GG-spectra are equivalently the motives of fractional 0-branes. Only that people usually say “spectral Mackey functor”, in order not to give away what it really means ;-)

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeSep 22nd 2018
    • (edited Sep 22nd 2018)

    Reading fractional D-brane I can kinda see what you mean, and something like this has been building up with that talk of motives of G-sets (which I now can’t find) and the Burnside category. Is it written out on some page?

    I see I was led to a similar question as #2 a couple of years ago. Push-pull through correspondences are everywhere.

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeSep 22nd 2018
    • (edited Sep 22nd 2018)

    Thanks for reminding me of the pointer to that old discussion. So I am referring to my old comment just beneath yours there.

    For a long time I thought that it must be a meaningless coincidence that GG-spectra realized as spectral Mackey functors are the 1d cohomological quantum field theory of a funny kind of G-particles. Now maybe, in view of equivariant stable cohomotopy classification of M-brane charge, I am beginning to see how it all comes together. Something like a spectral BFSS model for fractional 0-branes.

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeSep 23rd 2018

    What does “whose degrees of freedom are a set of 9+1 large matrices” mean at BFSS model? There are 10 matrices of a large size?

Add your comments
  • Please log in or leave your comment as a "guest post". If commenting as a "guest", please include your name in the message as a courtesy. Note: only certain categories allow guest posts.
  • To produce a hyperlink to an nLab entry, simply put double square brackets around its name, e.g. [[category]]. To use (La)TeX mathematics in your post, make sure Markdown+Itex is selected below and put your mathematics between dollar signs as usual. Only a subset of the usual TeX math commands are accepted: see here for a list.

  • (Help)