Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below
Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
I have started an entry on the Mittag-Leffler condition.
Here is a nice little historical note that I think we should incorporate. I'll write it up later.
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/14717/mittag-leffler-condition-whats-the-origin-of-its-name
Go ahead
The entry gives unnecessary emphasis on the case when the inverse system is a sequence, which is not needed for the definition and basic properties of ML condition. I have corrected the statement that the ML pro-objects are essentially epimorphic, before it states that they are isomorphic to essentially epimorphic what is odd as essentially epimorphic means to be isomorphic to a pro-object which has bonding morphisms epic on the nose. So one should either say the latter or to skip “isomorphic”.
1 to 4 of 4