Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf sheaves simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeSep 22nd 2018

    Plenty of people were mentioning lenses at SYCO 1. Can’t say I gained much of a feel for them. De Paiva’s Dialectica interpretation was mentioned in this respect, and apparently Mitchell Riley’s Categories of Optics is the place to go for a broader account.

    Curious how many young researchers reference the nLab, but shy away from describing their work there.

  1. Fascinating! I would have naively thought that, whilst obviously the technology has changed, the theory of lenses hadn’t evolved significantly since Spinoza was making them…!

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeSep 23rd 2018

    I think this meaning of “lens” is a mathematical one…

  2. Oh, oops!

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeSep 23rd 2018

    Sorry, I thought you were joking, or I would have answered myself.

  3. Hehe, no problem. As will now be evident, I hadn’t actually clicked on the links!

    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeSep 24th 2018
    • (edited Sep 24th 2018)

    But saying “lenses” and on top of that “optics” without any further qualification, as I see them do, is actively conjuring misunderstanding.

    I had had exactly the same thought that Richard had - and how should one not? - until I finally opened one of the articles.

    Hopefully there is enough substance in the theory to make up for this grandiose highjacking of terms?

    • CommentRowNumber8.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeSep 24th 2018

    Do you similarly object to words like “chromatic homotopy theory”? Mathematics has always stolen words from outside mathematics and given them new mathematical meanings.

    • CommentRowNumber9.
    • CommentAuthorAlexisHazell
    • CommentTimeSep 24th 2018

    According to this page,

    The name lens goes back to Benjamin Pierce’s work on bidirectional programming. … Before that they were a folklore technique in the functional programming world, known as ’functional references”