Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
  
  
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology definitions deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber101.
   • CommentAuthoratmacen
   • CommentTimeNov 7th 2018
   • PermaLink
   Author: atmacen
   Format: MarkdownItexRe #99: Thanks. Re #100: I'm not arguing for (i) over (ii), but I don't see how (ii) in $[C^op,Set]$ is a way of talking about (i) in $C$. I don't know what (i) in $C$ even means, since $C$ may not have a universe. There seems to be a serious misunderstanding about what (i) and (ii) are.

   Re #99: Thanks.

   Re #100:

   I’m not arguing for (i) over (ii), but I don’t see how (ii) in is a way of talking about (i) in . I don’t know what (i) in even means, since may not have a universe. There seems to be a serious misunderstanding about what (i) and (ii) are.

2. • CommentRowNumber102.
   • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
   • CommentTimeNov 7th 2018
   • PermaLink
   Author: Mike Shulman
   Format: MarkdownItexThe partiality of (i) in $C$ is also external, so it doesn't need a universe.

   The partiality of (i) in is also external, so it doesn’t need a universe.

3. • CommentRowNumber103.
   • CommentAuthoratmacen
   • CommentTimeNov 7th 2018
   • PermaLink
   Author: atmacen
   Format: MarkdownItexI reread some earlier comments on this subthread about (i) vs (ii). I think you're right, and I misunderstood what Dan wants. It now seems to me like he might count natural families $\Pi X\,:\,Ob(C),\,(Hom(y X,Tm))_\bot$ as (i). And as far as I understand, this is essentially what you get from an element of $Tm_\bot$ constructed in the semantic logical framework without funny tricks.

   I reread some earlier comments on this subthread about (i) vs (ii). I think you’re right, and I misunderstood what Dan wants. It now seems to me like he might count natural families as (i). And as far as I understand, this is essentially what you get from an element of constructed in the semantic logical framework without funny tricks.