Not signed in (Sign In)

Start a new discussion

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry beauty bundles calculus categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-theory cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundations functional-analysis functor galois-theory gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry goodwillie-calculus graph graphs gravity grothendieck group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory history homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory infinity integration-theory internal-categories k-theory kan lie lie-theory limit limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic manifolds mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nonassociative noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pasting philosophy physics planar pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory string-theory subobject superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeOct 28th 2018

    starting something, not done yet

    v1, current

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeNov 2nd 2018

    added pointer to the original article Snaith 74 and to the interpretation of the stable splitting as the Goodwillie-Taylor tower of the mapping space by Arone 99

    diff, v2, current

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorGuest
    • CommentTimeNov 2nd 2018
    Should that be $\Sigma^{+}_{\infty}Maps(X,A)$ or is that in based CW complexes?
    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorGuest
    • CommentTimeNov 2nd 2018

    Sorry, I meant Σ + Maps(X,A)\Sigma^{\infty}_{+}Maps(X,A) of course

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeNov 2nd 2018
    • (edited Nov 2nd 2018)

    I think the mapping space is/must be regarded as being pointed already, so that Σ Maps(X,A)\Sigma^\infty Maps(X,A) is correct.

    Abstractly, the stable splitting is the Goodwillie derivative of the functor Maps(X,)Maps(X,-), and that is a functor from and to pointed topological spaces.

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeNov 3rd 2018
    • (edited Nov 3rd 2018)

    added pointer to

    diff, v3, current

    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeNov 3rd 2018

    added now detailed definitions and statements up to Snaith 74 theorem 1.1 and Boedigheimer 87, Examples 2 and 5.

    So far, this material is duplicated also at configuration space of points. I think that’s okay. Once the discussion here enters the generalization as in Arone 99, the two entries will diverge.

    diff, v4, current

    • CommentRowNumber8.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeNov 3rd 2018

    There are diffeomorphic-invariant results on stable splitting here if needed:

    • Richard Manthorpe, Ulrike Tillmann, Tubular configurations: equivariant scanning and splitting, (arXiv:1307.5669)
    • CommentRowNumber9.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeNov 3rd 2018

    Thanks! I’ll have a look.

    • CommentRowNumber10.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeNov 6th 2018
    • (edited Nov 6th 2018)

    I have now added a section (here) indicating how the stable splitting of mapping spaces is the limiting Goodwillie-Taylor tower of the mapping space functor.

    I am just following the basic observations about excisiveness of the stages in the splitting formula, from the second page of Arone 99, but regarding assumptions on the space that we are homming out, and the notation and conventions on the mapping space, I am sticking with what I already had in the entry. (See the tables there for matching notation to the literature.)

    diff, v7, current

    • CommentRowNumber11.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTime14 hours ago
    • (edited 9 hours ago)

    Fixed the notation from the point on where the decomposition Conf n(X,Y)Conf n ord(X) Σ n(Y/Y) nConf_n(X,Y) \simeq Conf_n^{ord}(X) \wedge_{\Sigma_n} (Y/\partial Y)^{\wedge_n} is used (the superscriped for the ordered configuration space had been missing)

    diff, v10, current

    • CommentRowNumber12.
    • CommentAuthorDavidRoberts
    • CommentTime9 hours ago

    Comp=ConfComp=Conf in #11?

    • CommentRowNumber13.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTime9 hours ago

    Yes, thanks, fixed.

Add your comments
  • Please log in or leave your comment as a "guest post". If commenting as a "guest", please include your name in the message as a courtesy. Note: only certain categories allow guest posts.
  • To produce a hyperlink to an nLab entry, simply put double square brackets around its name, e.g. [[category]]. To use (La)TeX mathematics in your post, make sure Markdown+Itex is selected below and put your mathematics between dollar signs as usual. Only a subset of the usual TeX math commands are accepted: see here for a list.

  • (Help)