Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor galois-theory gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics planar pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).

nLab > Latest Changes: AdS-CFT correspondence

Bottom of Page

1 to 30 of 30

  1.  
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeNov 16th 2018

    considerably expanded the Idea-section

    diff, v68, current

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMay 17th 2019

    added pointer to

    diff, v78, current

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJul 10th 2019
    • (edited Jul 10th 2019)

    added this pointer

    on exact check of the duality, also in the stringy regime, for AdS 3/CFT 2AdS_3/CFT_2

    diff, v84, current

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeNov 4th 2019

    added pointer to today’s

    diff, v92, current

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeNov 18th 2019

    added a bunch of references on AdS 3/CFT 2AdS_3/CFT_2 realized on D2-D4-brane bound state-defects inside D6-D8 brane bound states and on D2-D6-brane bound state-defects inside D4-D8 brane bound states

    diff, v95, current

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeNov 27th 2019

    added pointer to today’s

    diff, v98, current

    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeDec 1st 2019

    I have moved part of the content of single trace operator to over here.

    This needs more editorial touches, clearly. But not tonight.

    diff, v101, current

    • CommentRowNumber8.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJan 12th 2020

    added pointer to this early review:

    diff, v108, current

    • CommentRowNumber9.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJan 14th 2020
    • (edited Jan 14th 2020)

    added pointers to more reviews:

    diff, v111, current

    • CommentRowNumber10.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJan 15th 2020

    added this reference on using the KK-compactification of D=4 N=4 super Yang-Mills theory to the BMN matrix model for lattice gauge theory-computations in D=4 N=4 SYM and for numerical checks of the AdS-CFT correspondence:

    • Masazumi Honda, Goro Ishiki, Sang-Woo Kim, Jun Nishimura, Asato Tsuchiya, Direct test of the AdS/CFT correspondence by Monte Carlo studies of N=4 super Yang-Mills theory, JHEP 1311 (2013) 200 (arXiv:1308.3525)

    diff, v114, current

    • CommentRowNumber11.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeFeb 9th 2020

    added a graphics (here) illustrating the dependency of the nature of the duality on the size of NN; and slightly expanded the text of the Idea-section around this

    diff, v119, current

    • CommentRowNumber12.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMar 3rd 2020

    added pointer to today’s

    diff, v122, current

    • CommentRowNumber13.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeApr 1st 2020

    added pointer to today’s

    diff, v125, current

    • CommentRowNumber14.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeApr 3rd 2020

    added pointer to today’s

    diff, v126, current

    • CommentRowNumber15.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeOct 28th 2020

    added, in the section of references for AdS 7/CFT 6AdS_7/CFT_6, these pointers:

    diff, v130, current

    • CommentRowNumber16.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeOct 28th 2020

    added publication data to:

    diff, v130, current

    • CommentRowNumber17.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeFeb 1st 2021

    A relevant paper here:

    • Oliver DeWolfe, Kenneth Higginbotham, Generalized symmetries and 2-groups via electromagnetic duality in AdS/CFT, (arXiv:2010.06594)

    Not sure where it would best fit in the references.

    • CommentRowNumber18.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeFeb 1st 2021

    Yeah, it’s hard to organize the recent activity by pure physicists on “2-group symmetries”.

    • CommentRowNumber19.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeFeb 3rd 2021

    added pointer to today’s

    diff, v132, current

    • CommentRowNumber20.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeFeb 25th 2021

    added pointer to today’s

    diff, v133, current

    • CommentRowNumber21.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeOct 22nd 2021

    added near the beginning of the Idea-section (here) a paragraph with general comments on the relation to the “holographic principle”.

    (prompted by David C.’s comment in another thread here)

    diff, v136, current

    • CommentRowNumber22.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeOct 22nd 2021

    Thanks!

    • CommentRowNumber23.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJun 13th 2022

    added pointer to page and verse of a standard reference, in the section “Small NN corrections” (here)

    diff, v142, current

  24. Added reference

    • Radin Dardashti, Richard Dawid, Sean Gryb, Karim Thébault (2020). On the Empirical Consequences of the AdS/CFT Duality. In Nick Huggett, Keizo Matsubara, and Christian Wüthrich (Eds.), Beyond Spacetime: The Foundations of Quantum Gravity (pp. 284-303). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (doi:10.1017/9781108655705.016, arXiv:1810.00949)

    Anonymous

    diff, v145, current

    • CommentRowNumber25.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeDec 20th 2022

    I have added DOI-link for

    and publication data + DOI link for:

    and author link for:

    diff, v146, current

    • CommentRowNumber26.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeDec 20th 2022

    have renamed the entry from just “AdS-CFT” to “AdS-CFT correspondence”

    diff, v146, current

    • CommentRowNumber27.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJan 25th 2023

    added pointer to:

    (by the title, apparently originally intended to touch on AdS-QCD, but de facto ending with focus on the problem of flat space holography)

    diff, v149, current

    • CommentRowNumber28.
    • CommentAuthorGuest
    • CommentTimeJan 29th 2023

    Does AdS/CFT hold near black holes? Jonathan Oppenheim has a twitter thread indicating that it might not:

    https://twitter.com/postquantum/status/1617141986238119937

    • CommentRowNumber29.
    • CommentAuthorGuest
    • CommentTimeJan 29th 2023

    The article makes no mention of the factorization problem in AdS/CFT, and could benefit with citing this article by Harlow and Jafferis and adding a section to the article on the factorization problem in AdS/CFT and possible ways, if any, to solve the factorization problem:

    • Daniel Harlow, Daniel Jafferis, The Factorization Problem in Jackiw-Teitelboim Gravity (arXiv:1804.01081)
    • CommentRowNumber30.
    • CommentAuthorGuest
    • CommentTimeJan 29th 2023

    Another source on the factorization problem in AdS/CFT which could be added to the article:

1 to 30 of 30

  1.