Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology definitions deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorvarkor
    • CommentTimeDec 10th 2018

    Fix duplicate redirect.

    diff, v28, current

  1. removing duplicate redirects

    Anonymous

    diff, v30, current

  2. adding some redirects “terminal coalgebra for an endofunctor”, “terminal coalgebras for an endofunctor”, “terminal coalgebra for the endofunctor”, “terminal coalgebras for the endofunctor”

    Anonymous

    diff, v30, current

  3. also removing duplicate redirect for terminal coalgebra

    Anonymous

    diff, v30, current

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorMatthias Hutzler
    • CommentTimeApr 4th 2023
    • (edited Apr 4th 2023)

    Hi! The page claims that the terminal coalgebra is the largest fixed point in that the unique coalgebra map “is an injection if C is Set”. Am I missing an implicit assumption here? If we take for example F=Id SetF = Id_{Set}, then the terminal coalgebra is 111 \to 1, and most fixed points of Id SetId_{Set} don’t embed into 11.

    My current understanding is that the “largest fixed point” claim is only true if we take “largest” as an informal word for “terminal”. But if there is more to it then I would like to understand it.

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorTodd_Trimble
    • CommentTimeApr 5th 2023

    Agreed; this doesn’t make sense as written. The mistake first appeared in Revision 2. Strange that nobody before now (including me) seems to have picked up on it.

    It’s true that in many cases, the initial algebra for an endofunctor on SetSet seems to embed in the terminal coalgebra (I don’t know off-hand just how general that is, but one idea that works in many cases is to construct the initial algebra as a colimit of the well-founded subcoalgebras of the terminal coalgebra, along the lines of Paul Taylor’s book). Possibly Toby was generalizing hastily from some such observation.