Not signed in (Sign In)

Start a new discussion

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor galois-theory gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics planar pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeDec 18th 2018

    Do other people see these final symbols as identical at Serre intersection formula?

    Given a regular scheme XX and subschemes Y,ZY,Z with defining ideal sheaves ,𝒥\mathcal{I},\mathcal{J}

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeDec 18th 2018

    and here?

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorAli Caglayan
    • CommentTimeDec 18th 2018

    This is to do with the mathcal font being weird. I’ve brought this up before. For some reason mathcal on nlab is this weird scripty version. It should really be like it is on mathoverflow.

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthoratmacen
    • CommentTimeDec 19th 2018
    They look different for me, and they both display on nLab, but on nForum, the second one is a Unicode box.
    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeDec 19th 2018

    They look different to me, and each is the same in both places, neither being a unicode box.

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorTim_Porter
    • CommentTimeDec 19th 2018

    FWIW: On my MacBook using Firefox, they display correctly both on the nLab page and here. I tested on Safari and although looking different from here, they are distinct, and readable, in both the Lab and here.

    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeDec 19th 2018

    I’m using Chrome. At MathOverflow they differ for me.

    • CommentRowNumber8.
    • CommentAuthorAli Caglayan
    • CommentTimeDec 19th 2018

    I am using Chrome too, this is probably the problem. If I remember correctly Chrome stopped supporting mathml a while back, so is this really a MathJax problem? In which case Richard could reconfigure it? I am only guessing because MathOverflow uses MathJax aswell if I remember correctly.

    • CommentRowNumber9.
    • CommentAuthorRichard Williamson
    • CommentTimeDec 19th 2018
    • (edited Dec 19th 2018)

    Here is the earlier thread. As in #6 there, there is a significant difference between the way MathJax is being used on MathOverflow and here; MathJax is parsing LaTeX directly on MathOverflow, whilst it is parsing MathML on the nLab.

    Looking at the HTML source, it looks like the MathML produced has <mi>I</mi>, where the I is already a unicode calligraphic symbol. It might be that if one used <mi mathvariant="script">I</mi> or something instead, using only an ASCII I, then MathJax would render it correctly. This would involve changing the Itex2MML source, though. For now, I would suggest just to change the page so that the two letters are distinguishable, e.g. by not using mathcal or by using different letters.

    • CommentRowNumber10.
    • CommentAuthorTim_Porter
    • CommentTimeDec 19th 2018

    Following David’s comment about Chrome I tried it on my machine and the letters do look similar but the J has a loop on the bottom whilst the I does not. The two letters are not looking the same.

    • CommentRowNumber11.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeDec 20th 2018

    Strange. They’re identical for me.

Add your comments
  • Please log in or leave your comment as a "guest post". If commenting as a "guest", please include your name in the message as a courtesy. Note: only certain categories allow guest posts.
  • To produce a hyperlink to an nLab entry, simply put double square brackets around its name, e.g. [[category]]. To use (La)TeX mathematics in your post, make sure Markdown+Itex is selected below and put your mathematics between dollar signs as usual. Only a subset of the usual TeX math commands are accepted: see here for a list.

  • (Help)