Processing math: 100%
Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology definitions deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration finite foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeDec 22nd 2018

    add your favourite redirect!

    v1, current

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeDec 22nd 2018

    added the example of poly-morphisms: here

    diff, v2, current

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeDec 22nd 2018

    What’s going on with the second point in ’Properties’? Is it just referring back to the first point, so the adjunction between Set and K gives rise to a 2-adjunction between categories enriched over them?

    Since it’s referring to something not present, was the intention to say something earlier on the underlying category construction generated by K(I,):KSet?

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeDec 22nd 2018

    That’s half-way copying the material from enriched categorychange of enriching category. I am out of time now, please complete if you have a minute.

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeDec 22nd 2018

    Ok, have tried to complete that.

    diff, v4, current

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeDec 22nd 2018

    Moved “underlying” example to “Examples” section.

    diff, v5, current

    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeDec 22nd 2018

    Added a bunch of generalizations.

    diff, v5, current

    • CommentRowNumber8.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeDec 22nd 2018

    I added a bunch more examples.

    diff, v5, current

    • CommentRowNumber9.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeDec 22nd 2018

    Thanks for making this page!

    • CommentRowNumber10.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeDec 22nd 2018

    And thanks for adding material!

    • CommentRowNumber11.
    • CommentAuthorGuest
    • CommentTimeOct 10th 2022
    >A different generalization is when V is a bicategory, yielding bicategory-enriched categories. Any lax functor of bicategories induces a similar functor between its 2-categories of enriched categories.

    Is there a reference for this fact?
  1. Fix dead link to Cruttwell’s thesis

    Nick Hu

    diff, v8, current