Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limit limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory subobject superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeDec 22nd 2018

    add your favourite redirect!

    v1, current

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeDec 22nd 2018

    added the example of poly-morphisms: here

    diff, v2, current

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeDec 22nd 2018

    What’s going on with the second point in ’Properties’? Is it just referring back to the first point, so the adjunction between SetSet and KK gives rise to a 2-adjunction between categories enriched over them?

    Since it’s referring to something not present, was the intention to say something earlier on the underlying category construction generated by K(I,):KSetK(I, -): K \to Set?

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeDec 22nd 2018

    That’s half-way copying the material from enriched categorychange of enriching category. I am out of time now, please complete if you have a minute.

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeDec 22nd 2018

    Ok, have tried to complete that.

    diff, v4, current

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeDec 22nd 2018

    Moved “underlying” example to “Examples” section.

    diff, v5, current

    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeDec 22nd 2018

    Added a bunch of generalizations.

    diff, v5, current

    • CommentRowNumber8.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeDec 22nd 2018

    I added a bunch more examples.

    diff, v5, current

    • CommentRowNumber9.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeDec 22nd 2018

    Thanks for making this page!

    • CommentRowNumber10.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeDec 22nd 2018

    And thanks for adding material!

    • CommentRowNumber11.
    • CommentAuthorGuest
    • CommentTimeOct 10th 2022
    >A different generalization is when V is a bicategory, yielding bicategory-enriched categories. Any lax functor of bicategories induces a similar functor between its 2-categories of enriched categories.

    Is there a reference for this fact?
  1. Fix dead link to Cruttwell’s thesis

    Nick Hu

    diff, v8, current