Not signed in (Sign In)

Start a new discussion

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration finite foundations functional-analysis functor galois-theory gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory internal-categories k-theory lie lie-theory limit limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic manifolds mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorDmitri Pavlov
    • CommentTimeDec 30th 2018
    • (edited Dec 30th 2018)

    This article has a weird claim on top, highlighted in yellow (see the second line):

    Redirected from “local Langlands correspondence”.

    Note: local Langlands conjecture and local Langlands conjecture both redirect for “local Langlands correspondence”.

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeDec 30th 2018

    I think I fixed it, by removing a duplicate of the line

      [[!redirects local Langlands correspondence]]
    

    diff, v5, current

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeDec 30th 2018

    (well, I made the error message go away. But it remains true that this error message was weird.)

  1. I agree that the error message is confusing! It comes from Instiki. Eventually I will move the handling of redirects out of the old Instiki.

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeFeb 28th 2021

    Added pointer to

    It is curious that our quest was to understand the local Langlands correspondence in an arithmetic setting, for potentially very ramified representations, and eventually we solved it by relating it to the global Langlands correspondence in a geometric setting, in the everywhere unramified setting.

    diff, v6, current

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeFeb 28th 2021

    You have a lonely “For” above the reference. Probably some comment intended but missing.

    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeFeb 28th 2021

    Oh yes, I was going to find something pithy to say, but then forgot. I’ll add

    For an approach via the Fargues–Fontaine curve

    We’ve discovered at least that this paper uses the tangent (,1)(\infty, 1)-topos to condensed spaces, from this MO answer.

    There’s probably still a world to tap into of condensed differential cohesion, but perhaps that will have to wait.

  2. Changed the description of the correspondence to reflect that the correspondence as initially stated is for GL_n. Added the description for more general reductive groups as stated in Chao Li’s notes from Jack Thorne’s class (also added in the references).

    Anton Hilado

    diff, v10, current

  3. Edited the statement to be more accurate (Weil-Deligne representations have to be F-semisimple and the representations of GL_n(F) have to be irreducible and admissible).

    Anton Hilado

    diff, v10, current

  4. Added some important definitions.

    Anton Hilado

    diff, v11, current

  5. Corrected Weil-Deligne representation.

    Anton Hilado

    diff, v11, current

  6. Corrected the example of GL_1.

    Anton Hilado

    diff, v11, current

    • CommentRowNumber13.
    • CommentAuthorDavidRoberts
    • CommentTimeApr 22nd 2021

    Thanks for making all these edits, Anton! It’s much appreciated.

    • CommentRowNumber14.
    • CommentAuthorAnton Hilado
    • CommentTimeApr 23rd 2021
    Thanks! I was also planning to make a page for the global Langlands correspondence for function fields and write up some things regarding V. Lafforgue's work on the automorphic to Galois direction. Apparently I was told this is not quite "geometric" Langlands yet - maybe to be geometric one needs the formulation involving sheaves, which comes from Grothendieck's sheaf-function correspondence. But I could also add this stuff to the geometric Langlands page, although I'm not quite sure how to go about it, where to insert it, etc. Any advice?
    • CommentRowNumber15.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeApr 23rd 2021

    Sounds like you want a page global Langlands correspondence. Do you know how to create a new page? Let me know if I should do it.

    • CommentRowNumber16.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeApr 23rd 2021

    In the Definition-section, I have taken the liberty of stating again the assumption that GG denotes a reductive group (if that’s the case, please check).

    Have added numbered Definition-environments and some cross-pointers.

    Have hyperlinked technical terms, by enclosing them in double square brackets [[...]]:

    e.g. p-adic field, residue field, class field theory

    also for basic ones (such as inverse image, linear representation, irrep, invariant subspace, subgroup),

    diff, v13, current

    • CommentRowNumber17.
    • CommentAuthorAnton Hilado
    • CommentTimeApr 23rd 2021

    Adding in the case of GL_2 (to be completed later).

    diff, v15, current

    • CommentRowNumber18.
    • CommentAuthorAnton Hilado
    • CommentTimeApr 23rd 2021

    Adding in the case of GL_2 (to be completed later).

    diff, v15, current

    • CommentRowNumber19.
    • CommentAuthorAnton Hilado
    • CommentTimeApr 23rd 2021

    Added the case of GL_2 (reference is to lecture 9 of Kevin Buzzard’s MSRI notes). Intending to explain how the different irreducible admissible representations are obtained later (for example as induced representations for the principal series and special ones.

    diff, v15, current

    • CommentRowNumber20.
    • CommentAuthorAnton Hilado
    • CommentTimeApr 23rd 2021

    Edited some typos, added a placeholder for geometrization (I intend to add in some stuff later).

    diff, v15, current

    • CommentRowNumber21.
    • CommentAuthorAnton Hilado
    • CommentTimeApr 23rd 2021
    Thank you for the further edits! I have made a few more edits today, and might add in a little more later. I think I can try for myself creating a new page for the global Langlands correspondence, but I'll be asking for more help here if I run into some difficulty!

    I'd like to ask as well - would it be better to change the page name from "local Langlands conjecture" to "local Langlands correspondence"?
    • CommentRowNumber22.
    • CommentAuthorAnton Hilado
    • CommentTimeApr 23rd 2021

    Added a section on p-adic and mod p local Langlands.

    diff, v16, current

    • CommentRowNumber23.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeApr 23rd 2021

    would it be better to change the page name from “local Langlands conjecture” to “local Langlands correspondence”

    I don’t know. If you are expert on these topics and have reason to prefer one over the other, then you are invited to change it.

    • CommentRowNumber24.
    • CommentAuthorAnton Hilado
    • CommentTimeApr 23rd 2021

    Added principal series and the Bernstein-Zelevinsky theorem.

    diff, v17, current

    • CommentRowNumber25.
    • CommentAuthorAnton Hilado
    • CommentTimeApr 23rd 2021

    Added the statement of the “geometric” local Langlands.

    diff, v20, current

    • CommentRowNumber26.
    • CommentAuthorAnton Hilado
    • CommentTimeApr 23rd 2021

    Changed the definition of Bun_G (should be G-torsors and not just vector bundles) and created new pages for “L-parameter” and “moduli stack of L-parameters”.

    diff, v21, current

Add your comments
  • Please log in or leave your comment as a "guest post". If commenting as a "guest", please include your name in the message as a courtesy. Note: only certain categories allow guest posts.
  • To produce a hyperlink to an nLab entry, simply put double square brackets around its name, e.g. [[category]]. To use (La)TeX mathematics in your post, make sure Markdown+Itex is selected below and put your mathematics between dollar signs as usual. Only a subset of the usual TeX math commands are accepted: see here for a list.

  • (Help)