Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory internal-categories k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeMar 19th 2010
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: Markdownexpanded a bit the discussion of morphisms of sites at [[site]]

   expanded a bit the discussion of morphisms of sites at site

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeMar 19th 2010
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: Markdowncreated a section <a href="http://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/site#TangentCategories">Morphisms of sites -- Examples -- Injections into tangent categories</a>. But check.

   created a section Morphisms of sites -- Examples -- Injections into tangent categories.

   But check.

3. • CommentRowNumber3.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeJan 16th 2011
   • (edited Jan 16th 2011)
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexI have tried to brush-up the entry [[site]] a bit. * rewrote the former Idea-section * gave the definition of morphism of sites in the general form (flat functors instead of left exact, since we don't demand finite limits in the first place) * wrote out most details of the proof that a morphism of sites induces a geometric morphism of sheaf toposes over them * reorganized the Examples-section, added a subsection with "classes of examples" and one with "specific examples". There is plenty of room for further improvements.

   I have tried to brush-up the entry site a bit.

   • rewrote the former Idea-section

   • gave the definition of morphism of sites in the general form (flat functors instead of left exact, since we don’t demand finite limits in the first place)

   • wrote out most details of the proof that a morphism of sites induces a geometric morphism of sheaf toposes over them

   • reorganized the Examples-section, added a subsection with “classes of examples” and one with “specific examples”.

   There is plenty of room for further improvements.

4. • CommentRowNumber4.
   • CommentAuthorzskoda
   • CommentTimeJan 17th 2011
   • (edited Jan 17th 2011)
   • PermaLink
   Author: zskoda
   Format: MarkdownItex> flat functors instead of left exact It is a matter of how modern we are. Your convention is that you use left exact only in the context of finitely complete categories, but many people use words flat and left exact fully interchangeably. On the other hand, I like that one considers sites which are not necessarily finitely complete.

   flat functors instead of left exact

   It is a matter of how modern we are. Your convention is that you use left exact only in the context of finitely complete categories, but many people use words flat and left exact fully interchangeably. On the other hand, I like that one considers sites which are not necessarily finitely complete.

5. • CommentRowNumber5.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeJan 17th 2011
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexOkay, in any case, the previous version of the entry said "finite-limit preserving functor".

   Okay, in any case, the previous version of the entry said “finite-limit preserving functor”.

6. • CommentRowNumber6.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeApr 27th 2011
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexadded to [[site]] more statements about the relation between morphisms of sites and geometric morphisms of their sheaf toposes

   added to site more statements about the relation between morphisms of sites and geometric morphisms of their sheaf toposes

7. • CommentRowNumber7.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeApr 27th 2011
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexI thought of what I think is a good (or at least better than before) statement about the _Idea_ of a site

   I thought of what I think is a good (or at least better than before) statement about the Idea of a site

8. • CommentRowNumber8.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeApr 27th 2011
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexI have added one more theorem and two more detailed proofs to [[site]].

   I have added one more theorem and two more detailed proofs to site.

9. • CommentRowNumber9.
   • CommentAuthorTim_Porter
   • CommentTimeFeb 28th 2013
   • PermaLink
   Author: Tim_Porter
   Format: MarkdownItexAt [[site]] there is a strange 'reference' (\ref{LemmaForClassifyingToposes}) that looks as if it is left over from a cut-and-paste from a latex document. Does anyone know to what it 'refers'?

   At site there is a strange ’reference’ (\ref{LemmaForClassifyingToposes}) that looks as if it is left over from a cut-and-paste from a latex document. Does anyone know to what it ’refers’?

10. • CommentRowNumber10.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeFeb 28th 2013
    • (edited Feb 28th 2013)
    • PermaLink
    Author: Urs
    Format: MarkdownItexI suppose what is meant is [this corollary at classifying topos](http://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/classifying+topos#SheafToposesAreClassifyingForTheirTheoryOfLocalAlgegras). I have fixed the links.

    I suppose what is meant is this corollary at classifying topos.

    I have fixed the links.

11. • CommentRowNumber11.
    • CommentAuthorTim_Porter
    • CommentTimeFeb 28th 2013
    • PermaLink
    Author: Tim_Porter
    Format: MarkdownItexThanks. (I've just fixed a spelling typo there.)

    Thanks. (I’ve just fixed a spelling typo there.)