Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology definitions deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
   • CommentTimeJan 29th 2019
   • PermaLink
   Author: Mike Shulman
   Format: MarkdownItexI have a silly question. Suppose $E$ is a simplicially enriched category (or maybe a category enriched over any cartesian monoidal category, or maybe even any monoidal category, though that seems more dubious). Then its slice categories $E/x$ are also simplicially enriched, where for $f:y\to x$ and $g:z\to x$ the hom-object $(E/x)(f,g)$ is the fiber of $(g\circ -) : E(y,z) \to E(y,x)$ over $f$. Simplicial copowers in these slice categories are, like ordinary colimits, created in $E$, which means in particular that for $f:x \to y$ the induced functor $f_! : E/x \to E/y$ preserves copowers. Equivalently, the adjunction $f_! \dashv f^*$ is simplicially enriched, and the pullback functor $f^*$ preserves simplicial powers. Now what if $E$ is also locally cartesian closed, so that $f^*$ has a right adjoint $f_*$? Is the adjunction $f^* \dashv f_*$ also necessarily simplicially enriched? Does pullback $f^*$ preserve copowers, and dependent product $f_*$ preserve powers? I feel like I should know the answer, and I know that in the past I've believed that this was true; but I also can't see how it to prove it right now.

   I have a silly question. Suppose $E$ is a simplicially enriched category (or maybe a category enriched over any cartesian monoidal category, or maybe even any monoidal category, though that seems more dubious). Then its slice categories $E/x$ are also simplicially enriched, where for $f:y\to x$ and $g:z\to x$ the hom-object $(E/x)(f,g)$ is the fiber of $(g\circ -) : E(y,z) \to E(y,x)$ over $f$. Simplicial copowers in these slice categories are, like ordinary colimits, created in $E$, which means in particular that for $f:x \to y$ the induced functor $f_! : E/x \to E/y$ preserves copowers. Equivalently, the adjunction $f_! \dashv f^*$ is simplicially enriched, and the pullback functor $f^*$ preserves simplicial powers.

   Now what if $E$ is also locally cartesian closed, so that $f^*$ has a right adjoint $f_*$? Is the adjunction $f^* \dashv f_*$ also necessarily simplicially enriched? Does pullback $f^*$ preserve copowers, and dependent product $f_*$ preserve powers? I feel like I should know the answer, and I know that in the past I’ve believed that this was true; but I also can’t see how it to prove it right now.

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
   • CommentTimeJan 30th 2019
   • PermaLink
   Author: Mike Shulman
   Format: MarkdownItexActually I think the question can be reduced to the simpler case of ordinary cartesian closure. That is, if $E$ is an enriched category with products (in the enriched sense) whose underlying category is cartesian closed, is the cartesian-closure adjunction necessarily an enriched adjunction?

   Actually I think the question can be reduced to the simpler case of ordinary cartesian closure. That is, if $E$ is an enriched category with products (in the enriched sense) whose underlying category is cartesian closed, is the cartesian-closure adjunction necessarily an enriched adjunction?