Not signed in (Sign In)

Start a new discussion

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-theory cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive constructive-mathematics cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor galois-theory gauge-theory gebra geometric geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMar 10th 2019

    for ease of reference, and to go along with SO(2), Spin(2), Pin(2), Spin(3), Spin(4)

    v1, current

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMar 16th 2019

    added the following statement; which appears as Lemma 2.1 in


    S 4 BSpin(4) π BSpin(5) \array{ S^4 &\longrightarrow& B Spin(4) \\ && \big\downarrow^{\mathrlap{\pi}} \\ && B Spin(5) }

    be the spherical fibration of classifying spaces induced from the canonical inclusion of Spin(4) into Spin(5) and using that the 4-sphere is equivalently the coset space S 4Spin(5)/Spin(4)S^4 \simeq Spin(5)/Spin(4) (this Prop.).

    Then the fiber integration of the triple cup power of the Euler class χH 4(BSpin(4),)\chi \in H^4\big( B Spin(4), \mathbb{Z}\big) (see this Prop) is twice the second Pontryagin class:

    π *(χ 3)=2p 2H 4(BSpin(5),). \pi_\ast \left( \chi^3 \right) \;=\; 2 p_2 \;\;\in\;\; H^4\big( B Spin(5), \mathbb{Z} \big) \,.

    diff, v2, current

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMar 20th 2019

    added the following statement, but for the moment without good referencing:

    The integral cohomology ring of the classifying space BSpin(5)B Spin(5) is spanned by two generators

    1. the first fractional Pontryagin class 12p 1\tfrac{1}{2}p_1

    2. the linear combination 12p 212(p 1) 2\tfrac{1}{2}p_2 - \tfrac{1}{2}(p_1)^2 of the half the second Pontryagin class with half the cup product-square of the first Pontryagin class:

    H (BSpin(5),)[12p 1,12p 212(p 1) 2] H^\bullet \big( B Spin(5), \mathbb{Z} \big) \;\simeq\; \mathbb{Z} \left[ \tfrac{1}{2}p_1, \; \tfrac{1}{2}p_2 - \tfrac{1}{2}(p_1)^2 \right]

    diff, v4, current

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorJohn Baez
    • CommentTimeJan 16th 2021

    Added a proof that Spin(5) is isomorphic to Sp(2).

    diff, v15, current

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorDavidRoberts
    • CommentTimeJan 16th 2021

    every invariant subspace has an invariant complement, so one or both of the 6-dimensional subspaces Λ + 2V\Lambda_+^2 V and Λ 2V\Lambda_-^2 V must have a 5-dimensional subspace invariant under the action of Sp(V)\mathrm{Sp}(V)

    I get that the invariant subspace at the start of this quote is generated by the element JJ preserved by SU(4)SU(4), but it’s not clear what the subspace is. Is it the real span? Why the claim that one or both of Λ + 2V\Lambda_+^2 V and Λ 2V\Lambda_-^2 V have an invariant subspace?

Add your comments
  • Please log in or leave your comment as a "guest post". If commenting as a "guest", please include your name in the message as a courtesy. Note: only certain categories allow guest posts.
  • To produce a hyperlink to an nLab entry, simply put double square brackets around its name, e.g. [[category]]. To use (La)TeX mathematics in your post, make sure Markdown+Itex is selected below and put your mathematics between dollar signs as usual. Only a subset of the usual TeX math commands are accepted: see here for a list.

  • (Help)