Not signed in (Sign In)

Start a new discussion

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry bundles calculus categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-theory cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive constructive-mathematics cosmology definitions deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry differential-topology digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration finite foundations functional-analysis functor galois-theory gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory history homological homological-algebra homology homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory infinity integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal-logic model model-category-theory monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology multicategories newpage noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pasting philosophy physics planar pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string-theory subobject superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorJames Francese
    • CommentTimeMar 20th 2019

    I’ve created a page for quaternionic manifolds, linked from quaternion-Kähler page. Basic references and discussion of main definition re Cauchy-Feuter calculus. Comparison to hypercomplex structure.

    v1, current

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMar 21st 2019

    Thanks! And I have added now the link going the other way, too.

    Might you have energy to add a sentence putting the two in relation?

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorJames Francese
    • CommentTimeMar 21st 2019

    Great idea, I’ve added a comment connecting their notations and a statement of why quaternionic-Kähler manifolds are indeed quaternionic.

    diff, v4, current

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMar 21st 2019
    • (edited Mar 21st 2019)

    Thanks!

    I gave the discussion of “qK is q” a numbered Example-environment (here) and placed that inside an Examples section.

    Also, I created a Properties-section and made your two stub sections “Holonomy” and “Twistor space” be subsections of that.

    diff, v5, current

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMar 21st 2019
    • (edited Mar 21st 2019)

    By the way, I would tend to make your “Discussion”-subsection be a numbered Remark inside the “Definition”-section instead.

    (I find it helpful to think in terms of textbook organization: There we would rarely make a comment on a definition be its own subsection.)

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorJames Francese
    • CommentTimeMar 21st 2019

    Thanks Urs. And agreed, that is much more natural. I’m paying attention to the changes you’ve been making as I add material; as I learn more itex + markdown and nLab style I can follow suit.

    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorJames Francese
    • CommentTimeMar 21st 2019

    Added more classical and a few specialty references, including Bonan’s seminal paper.

    diff, v6, current

Add your comments
  • Please log in or leave your comment as a "guest post". If commenting as a "guest", please include your name in the message as a courtesy. Note: only certain categories allow guest posts.
  • To produce a hyperlink to an nLab entry, simply put double square brackets around its name, e.g. [[category]]. To use (La)TeX mathematics in your post, make sure Markdown+Itex is selected below and put your mathematics between dollar signs as usual. Only a subset of the usual TeX math commands are accepted: see here for a list.

  • (Help)