Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory internal-categories k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorJames Francese
    • CommentTimeMar 20th 2019

    I’ve created a page for quaternionic manifolds, linked from quaternion-Kähler page. Basic references and discussion of main definition re Cauchy-Feuter calculus. Comparison to hypercomplex structure.

    v1, current

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMar 21st 2019

    Thanks! And I have added now the link going the other way, too.

    Might you have energy to add a sentence putting the two in relation?

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorJames Francese
    • CommentTimeMar 21st 2019

    Great idea, I’ve added a comment connecting their notations and a statement of why quaternionic-Kähler manifolds are indeed quaternionic.

    diff, v4, current

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMar 21st 2019
    • (edited Mar 21st 2019)

    Thanks!

    I gave the discussion of “qK is q” a numbered Example-environment (here) and placed that inside an Examples section.

    Also, I created a Properties-section and made your two stub sections “Holonomy” and “Twistor space” be subsections of that.

    diff, v5, current

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMar 21st 2019
    • (edited Mar 21st 2019)

    By the way, I would tend to make your “Discussion”-subsection be a numbered Remark inside the “Definition”-section instead.

    (I find it helpful to think in terms of textbook organization: There we would rarely make a comment on a definition be its own subsection.)

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorJames Francese
    • CommentTimeMar 21st 2019

    Thanks Urs. And agreed, that is much more natural. I’m paying attention to the changes you’ve been making as I add material; as I learn more itex + markdown and nLab style I can follow suit.

    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorJames Francese
    • CommentTimeMar 21st 2019

    Added more classical and a few specialty references, including Bonan’s seminal paper.

    diff, v6, current

    • CommentRowNumber8.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJul 15th 2020
    • (edited Jul 15th 2020)

    completed the pointer to

    • Dmitri V. Alekseevsky, Stefano Marchiafava, Quaternionic-like structures on a manifold: Note I. 1-integrability and integrability conditions, Atti della Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei. Classe di Scienze Fisiche, Matematiche e Naturali. Rendiconti Lincei. Matematica e Applicazioni (1993) Volume: 4, Issue: 1, page 43-52 (dml:244082)

    and added pointer to

    • Dmitri V. Alekseevsky, Stefano Marchiafava, Quaternionic-like structures on a manifold: Note II. Automorphism groups and their interrelations, Atti della Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei. Classe di Scienze Fisiche, Matematiche e Naturali. Rendiconti Lincei. Matematica e Applicazioni (1993) Volume: 4, Issue: 1, page 53-61 (dml:244299)

    diff, v8, current

    • CommentRowNumber9.
    • CommentAuthoraleks_kleyn
    • CommentTime1 day ago
    • (edited 1 day ago)

    Because you consider quaternionic manifold, then tangent plane is vector space over quaternion algebra. In vector space over quaternion algebra, we need to distinguish linear map and homomorphism. When I select basis in vector space, automorphism is still presented by matrix with quaternion entries. However, to represent linear map of vector space over quaternion algebra, I need matrix with entries from algebra HHH\otimes H. Now we can see the structure of connection Γ kj i\Gamma^i_{kj} where index kk is responsible for displacement along manifold and indices ii, jj are responsible for transformation of vector in tangent plane. I will start from transformation of vector. When I move from one point to another, transformation of vector is due to change of basis in tangent plane. Therefore indices ii, jj are responsible for homomorphism. The story about index kk is different. I can consider set of bases in different tangent planes as almost everywhere continues map, displacement along manifold as differential and connection as derivative. Therefore, connection is responsible for linear transformation. From this it follows that connection is set of tensors like Γ s0 kj iΓ s1 kj i\Gamma_{s0}^{}{}^i_{kj}\otimes\Gamma_{s1}^{}{}^i_{kj} (we have here sum over index s) and corresponding change of vector has form

    dv i=Γ s0 kj idx kΓ s1 kj iv jdv^i=\Gamma_{s0}^{}{}^i_{kj}dx^k\Gamma_{s1}^{}{}^i_{kj}v^j