Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf sheaves simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthoraleksr
   • CommentTimeMar 21st 2019
   • PermaLink
   Author: aleksr
   Format: MarkdownItexThis is a base topic of my contribution. It introduces a new function that gives series whose coefficients are powers of fine structure constant. Furthermore each member represents natural physical interaction. It can be treated as natural physics that introduces natural particles. May be I made a lot of mistakes. I will correct them. <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/hyperanalytic+function/1">v1</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/hyperanalytic+function">current</a>

   This is a base topic of my contribution. It introduces a new function that gives series whose coefficients are powers of fine structure constant. Furthermore each member represents natural physical interaction. It can be treated as natural physics that introduces natural particles.

   May be I made a lot of mistakes. I will correct them.

   v1, current

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthoraleksr
   • CommentTimeMar 21st 2019
   • PermaLink
   Author: aleksr
   Format: MarkdownItexThis is a base topic of my contribution. It introduces a new function that gives series whose coefficients are powers of fine structure constant. Furthermore each member represents natural physical interaction. It can be treated as natural physics that introduces natural particles. May be I made a lot of mistakes. I will correct them. <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/hyperanalytic+function/1">v1</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/hyperanalytic+function">current</a>

   This is a base topic of my contribution. It introduces a new function that gives series whose coefficients are powers of fine structure constant. Furthermore each member represents natural physical interaction. It can be treated as natural physics that introduces natural particles.

   May be I made a lot of mistakes. I will correct them.
   

   v1, current

3. • CommentRowNumber3.
   • CommentAuthorRichard Williamson
   • CommentTimeMar 24th 2019
   • (edited Mar 24th 2019)
   • PermaLink
   Author: Richard Williamson
   Format: MarkdownItexPage deleted, but content available [here](https://nforum.ncatlab.org/discussion/9735/a-priori-knowledge-physics/?Focus=76794#Comment_76794).

   Page deleted, but content available here.

4. • CommentRowNumber4.
   • CommentAuthoraleksr
   • CommentTimeJan 18th 2020
   • PermaLink
   Author: aleksr
   Format: MarkdownItexCould someone return my page "Hyperanalytic functions" to the normal position, please. I would like to continue it.

   Could someone return my page “Hyperanalytic functions” to the normal position, please. I would like to continue it.

5. • CommentRowNumber5.
   • CommentAuthorTodd_Trimble
   • CommentTimeJan 19th 2020
   • PermaLink
   Author: Todd_Trimble
   Format: MarkdownItexIt sounds like you weren't listening to any of our earlier concerns. Anyway, the nLab cannot function as a perch for random people to write up their personal theories. So the answer for now is: no.

   It sounds like you weren’t listening to any of our earlier concerns. Anyway, the nLab cannot function as a perch for random people to write up their personal theories. So the answer for now is: no.

6. • CommentRowNumber6.
   • CommentAuthorGuest
   • CommentTimeJan 19th 2020
   • PermaLink
   Author: Guest
   Format: MarkdownItexI understood what you said. However, let me show just a small piece of power an hyperanalytic function. I apologize that I do not know how to use Markdown+Itex. As is known in the Standard Model, the baryon asymmetry of the universe is an unsolved physical problem. P.A.M. Dirac showed that $$ \frac{q_{S}}{q_{e}}=\frac{q_{N}}{q_{p}}=\frac{1}{2\alpha}, $$ where $q_{S}$ и $q_{N}$ — Dirac's magnetic monopoly charges, $q_{e}$ — electron charge and $q_{p}$ — positron charge, and $\alpha$ — fine structure constant. Since there are charges of particles and antiparticles in the denominators, we can expect that in the numerators there are also charges of particles and antiparticles! Using my definition of the fine structure constant $$ \alpha\left(\sigma\right)=\frac{1}{2}\frac{\mathbb{R}_{max}-\mathbb{R}_{min}}{\mathbb{R}_{max}+\mathbb{R}_{min}}. $$ you can get $$ \frac{\mathbb{R}_{min}}{\mathbb{R}_{max}}=\frac{1-2\alpha\left(\sigma\right)}{1+2\alpha\left(\sigma\right)}. $$ Thus, the hyperanalytic function explains the baryon asymmetry of the universe by the following connection between electrical and magnetic charges: $$ \frac{\mathbb{R}_{min}}{\mathbb{R}_{max}}=\frac{{q_{S}}/{q_{e}}-1}{{q_{N}}/{q_{p}}+1}. $$

   I understood what you said. However, let me show just a small piece of power an hyperanalytic function. I apologize that I do not know how to use Markdown+Itex.

   As is known in the Standard Model, the baryon asymmetry of the universe is an unsolved physical problem.

   P.A.M. Dirac showed that

   $$\frac{q_{S}}{q_{e}}=\frac{q_{N}}{q_{p}}=\frac{1}{2\alpha},$$

   where $q_{S}$ и $q_{N}$ — Dirac’s magnetic monopoly charges, $q_{e}$ — electron charge and $q_{p}$ — positron charge, and $\alpha$ — fine structure constant. Since there are charges of particles and antiparticles in the denominators, we can expect that in the numerators there are also charges of particles and antiparticles!

   Using my definition of the fine structure constant

   $$\alpha\left(\sigma\right)=\frac{1}{2}\frac{\mathbb{R}_{max}-\mathbb{R}_{min}}{\mathbb{R}_{max}+\mathbb{R}_{min}}.$$

   you can get

   $$\frac{\mathbb{R}_{min}}{\mathbb{R}_{max}}=\frac{1-2\alpha\left(\sigma\right)}{1+2\alpha\left(\sigma\right)}.$$

   Thus, the hyperanalytic function explains the baryon asymmetry of the universe by the following connection between electrical and magnetic charges:

   $$\frac{\mathbb{R}_{min}}{\mathbb{R}_{max}}=\frac{{q_{S}}/{q_{e}}-1}{{q_{N}}/{q_{p}}+1}.$$
7. • CommentRowNumber7.
   • CommentAuthoraleksr
   • CommentTimeJan 19th 2020
   • PermaLink
   Author: aleksr
   Format: MarkdownItexAleksandr Rybnnikov New York, NY

   Aleksandr Rybnnikov New York, NY

8. • CommentRowNumber8.
   • CommentAuthorDavidRoberts
   • CommentTimeJan 20th 2020
   • PermaLink
   Author: DavidRoberts
   Format: MarkdownItexI second what Todd wrote in #5.

   I second what Todd wrote in #5.

9. • CommentRowNumber9.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeJan 20th 2020
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexHi Aleksandr, your reply in #6 only strengthened the point that your material is not appropriate here. Also, there is nobody here who would give you the the feedback you will be looking for, so that neither we nor you yourself should have any interest in continuing this. To get actual feedback, you might want to consider sharing your thoughts on _[PhysicsForums](https://www.physicsforums.com/)_, such as in the section _[High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics Forum](https://www.physicsforums.com/forums/high-energy-nuclear-particle-physics.65/)_ or maybe rather in _[Beyond the Standard Model Forum](https://www.physicsforums.com/forums/beyond-the-standard-model.66)_ where they are quite used to this kind of exchange.

   Hi Aleksandr,

   your reply in #6 only strengthened the point that your material is not appropriate here. Also, there is nobody here who would give you the the feedback you will be looking for, so that neither we nor you yourself should have any interest in continuing this.

   To get actual feedback, you might want to consider sharing your thoughts on PhysicsForums, such as in the section High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics Forum or maybe rather in Beyond the Standard Model Forum where they are quite used to this kind of exchange.